2018
DOI: 10.3788/ope.20182610.2415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of uncertainty in multilateration with laser tracker

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…w w w   are set as the reciprocal of the square of the j th reference point's the uncertainty. Then by nonlinear optimization calculation, the coordinate system of each laser tracker aligns with a global spatial coordinate frame [5] .…”
Section: Spatial Coordinate Frame Alignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…w w w   are set as the reciprocal of the square of the j th reference point's the uncertainty. Then by nonlinear optimization calculation, the coordinate system of each laser tracker aligns with a global spatial coordinate frame [5] .…”
Section: Spatial Coordinate Frame Alignmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figure 1, let the reference points of the two ends of the length standard be P1, P2, O is the laser tracker origin, and O' indicates the mirror image origin of the laser tracker. The angular uncertainty of the laser tracker is much larger than the distance uncertainty, and in order to obtain a smaller uncertainty of the length measurement, the three points O, P1, and P2 should be made to be co-linear [10,11] . In order to achieve the colocation of O, P1, and P2, this paper adopts the laser tracking interferometric length measurement method based on mirror reflection.…”
Section: Mirror Reflection Laser Tracking Interferometry Principlementioning
confidence: 99%