2006
DOI: 10.3758/bf03192778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of unsupervised semantic mapping of natural language with Leximancer concept mapping

Abstract: The Leximancer system is a relatively new method for transforming lexical co-occurrence information from natural language into semantic patterns in an unsupervised manner. It employs two stages of co-occurrence information extraction-semantic and relational-using a different algorithm for each stage. The algorithms used are statistical, but they employ nonlinear dynamics and machine learning. This article is an attempt to validate the output of Leximancer, using a set of evaluation criteria taken from content … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
812
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 955 publications
(815 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
812
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted by Campbell et al (2011, p. 92), as "evidence accumulates … The tool automatically and efficiently learns that words predict which concepts." Leximancer derived concept identification has exhibited high face validity, high reliability and reproducibility and thematic clustering without facing the biases associated with manually coded text analyses (Smith & Humphreys, 2006). It is found to be superior to other approaches, such as NVIVO, particularly when the goal is to quickly discover key themes and the relationship between concepts (Sotiriadou, Brouwers & Le, 2014).…”
Section: Appendix 2: Text Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Campbell et al (2011, p. 92), as "evidence accumulates … The tool automatically and efficiently learns that words predict which concepts." Leximancer derived concept identification has exhibited high face validity, high reliability and reproducibility and thematic clustering without facing the biases associated with manually coded text analyses (Smith & Humphreys, 2006). It is found to be superior to other approaches, such as NVIVO, particularly when the goal is to quickly discover key themes and the relationship between concepts (Sotiriadou, Brouwers & Le, 2014).…”
Section: Appendix 2: Text Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its versatile applications by other researchers, Leximancer has been described as a "textmining tool for visualizing the structure of concepts and themes in text" [2:25], a visual tool for making sense of big data [3], a data mining tool [36], a tool for qualitative data analysis [11], quantitative content analysis [28] and a quantitative tool for conducting qualitative analysis of text data [21].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting concept maps are used by Leximancer to establish the relational strength between different concepts so that it could be used by the researchers to interpret the strength of different associations. The software has been extensively evaluated for stability, reproducibility and correlative validity of underlying statistical algorithms [36].…”
Section: Foundations Of Lexical Analysis With Leximancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result of this qualitative analysis with Leximancer is a set of concept maps, where the concept frequency, the hierarchical order of appearance and the proximity among concepts are visualised (Smith & Humphreys, 2006). Each thematic region is formed based on the connectedness of concepts and highlighted by the most relevant concept in terms of frequency and connections (relational analysis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%