2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Urology Residents’ Perception of Surgical Theater Educational Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study showed a higher satisfaction level with learning in the OR than Binsaleh et al study, in which Saudi urology residents perceived the surgical theater educational environment as less than ideal. 27 In our study, the second highest level of satisfaction was with the role of senior (chief) resident/fellow in teaching. Several studies have discussed the benefits of having a chief resident and fellows enrolled in education.…”
Section: Satisfaction Level With Quality Of Teachingmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study showed a higher satisfaction level with learning in the OR than Binsaleh et al study, in which Saudi urology residents perceived the surgical theater educational environment as less than ideal. 27 In our study, the second highest level of satisfaction was with the role of senior (chief) resident/fellow in teaching. Several studies have discussed the benefits of having a chief resident and fellows enrolled in education.…”
Section: Satisfaction Level With Quality Of Teachingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Our study showed a higher satisfaction level with learning in the OR than Binsaleh et al study, in which Saudi urology residents perceived the surgical theater educational environment as less than ideal. 27 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deriving a percentage score from a rating scale is a common method for presenting EEM scores. 4,5,[19][20][21][22][23][24] The wider and consistent margins inherent in a 0-100 scale facilitate comparison between different measures or the same measure applied at a different time or place. A requirement for converting from a rating scale to a percentage score is factoring a zero point into the conversion if the lowest value in the original scale is not zero.…”
Section: Conversion To Percentage Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el caso de los residentes la revisión de la literatura evidencia tasas de respuesta que oscilan entre el 30,0% (Hoonpongsimanont, Murphy, Kim, Nasir, & Compton, 2014;López Timoneda, et al, 2007), 37,0% (Andreu, et al, 2012), 42,9% (Moro, Tejedor, & Zancajo, 2006), 45,8% (Binsaleh, Babaeer, Rabah, & Madbouly, 2015), 47,0% (Rodríguez González, et al, 2000), 60,0% (Gómez-Beneyto, et al, 2011), 60,6% (Gutiérrez-Alcántara, Moreno-Fernández, Palomares-Ortega, García-Manzanares, & Benito-López, 2011), 63,0% (Piessen, et al, 2013), 66,6% (Pijoan, et al, 2001), 74,9% (Takahashi et al, 2009), 78,0% (Ríos Zambudio, et al, 2004b) y 79,03% (Vázquez Mata, et al, 2011.…”
Section: ) Traumatología Y Cirugía Ortopédicaunclassified
“…Respecto a la tasa de respuesta en los estudios con distribución vía mail de las encuestas, en 4 de ellos fue similar a las obtenidas para Obstetricia y Ginecología en el año 2013, 30,0% (López Timoneda, et al, 2007), 30,0% (Hoonpongsimanont, et al, 2014), 37,0% (Andreu, et al, 2012) y 45,8% (Binsaleh, et al, 2015); sin embargo los otros 3 consiguieron tasas de participación más aceptables del 63,0% (Piessen, et al, 2013), 74,9% (Takahashi, et al, 2009) y 78,0% (Ríos Zambudio, et al, 2004b).…”
Section: ) Traumatología Y Cirugía Ortopédicaunclassified