Evaluation of UV post-curing depth for homogenous cross-linking of stereolithography parts

Abstract

Purpose During post-processing of stereolithography photopolymers, the limited penetration depth of ultraviolet (UV) light can lead to inhomogeneous cross-linking. This is a major problem in part design for industrial applications as this creates uncertainty regarding the mechanical load capacity. Therefore, this paper aims to present an experimental method to measure the post-curing depth in stereolithography photopolymers. Design/methodology/approach Printed specimens made from urethane acrylate photopolymers are placed in a protective housing and are exposed on one side to UV light during post-processing. A depth profile of the hardness according to ASTM D2240 Shore D is determined alongside the specimens. UVA,-B and -C spectra are investigated and the dependence on exposure dose and pigmentation is studied. The results are directly linked to the mechanical properties via tensile tests and validated on an automotive trim part. Findings Exposure with a 405 nm light-emitting diode provides the deepest homogenous post-curing depth of 10.5 mm, which depends on the overall exposure dose and pigmentation. If the initially transparent photopolymer is colored with black pigments, post-curing depth is significantly reduced and no homogenous post-curing can be achieved. To obtain comparable mechanical properties by tensile tests, complete cross-linking of the specimen cross-section has to be ensured. Research limitations/implications The spatial resolution of the presented measurement method depends on the indenter size and sample hardness. As a result, the resolution of the used setup is limited in the area close to the edges of the specimen. Originality/value This paper shows that the spatially resolved hardness measurement provides more information on the post-curing influence than the evaluation of global mechanical properties. The presented method can be used to ensure homogenous cross-linking of stereolithography parts.

Influence of Block Copolymer Concentration and Resin Crosslink Density on the Properties of UV‐Curable Methacrylate Resin Systems

“…The degree of cure (DoC) is a crucial factor for the final properties of the material, especially for chain‐growth polymerization such as UV‐curing resin systems where the network is not fully formed until the late stages of curing. The DoC depends on factors such as oxygen inhibition, [ 44 ] photoinitiator and pigment concentration, [ 45 ] or monomer functionality [ 46 ] and can lead to formulations with uncured monomers and cure gradients within the sample. The degree of cure was determined by Raman spectroscopy [ 47,48 ] which, in contrast to IR spectroscopy, is more sensitive to homo‐nuclear bonds such as the CC double bond in the vinyl ester group.…”

In‐plane and in‐depth frontal polymerization behaviors of continuous fiber‐reinforced epoxy composites

“…[4][5][6] In contrast, the ultraviolet (UV) light curing method can effectively reduce air pollution and energy consumption but this method can be only used to cure a thin-layered thermoset due to the weak penetration capability of UV light. 7,8 Among these methods, frontal polymerization (FP) is a self-sustaining curing process that relies on the heat released by polymerization exothermicity when in forming monomers to polymers, accompanied by a continuously propagating polymerization front, [9][10][11][12][13] realizing curing the epoxy resin within minutes.…”

Optimization of LB-PBF process parameters to achieve best relative density and surface roughness for Ti6Al4V samples: using NSGA-II algorithm

“…Additive manufacturing (AM), also known as rapid prototyping or three-dimensional (3D)-printing, is a novel manufacturing method based on layer-by-layer fabrication (Hui et al , 2021; Bártolo and Gibson, 2011). The first commercial AM machine was stereolithography and used ultraviolet rays in 1987 (Bártolo and Gibson, 2011; Schlotthauer et al , 2021). Filament deposition method, solid ground curing and planer layering were three commercial models with different working procedures presented in 1991 (Gibson et al , 2021; Wohlers and Gornet, 2014).…”