2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2011.06.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of variability of morphological traits of selected caraway (Carum carvi L.) genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationships between all the traits were estimated on the basis of correlation coefficients (Kozak et al, 2010). Graphic distribution of the cultivars and lines described by combined traits of seed thickness and mechanical loads was obtained with the use of the analysis of canonical variables Morrison, 1976;Rybiński et al, , 2011Seidler-Łożykowska and Bocianowski, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationships between all the traits were estimated on the basis of correlation coefficients (Kozak et al, 2010). Graphic distribution of the cultivars and lines described by combined traits of seed thickness and mechanical loads was obtained with the use of the analysis of canonical variables Morrison, 1976;Rybiński et al, , 2011Seidler-Łożykowska and Bocianowski, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes into account the correlations of the data set and is scale-invariant. It has a multivariate effect size, more effective than principal component analysis (Mahalanobis 1936;Seidler-Łożykowska and Bocianowski 2012). The Mahalanobis distance was suggested as a measure of 'polytrait" object similarity, whose significance was verified by means of critical value D critical called "the least significant distance".…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results were also analyzed using multivariate methods. Analysis of canonical variables was applied in order to present multitrait assessment of similarity of tested taxa in a lower number of dimensions with the least possible loss of information [41]. This makes it possible to illustrate variation in species in terms of all observed traits in the graphic form.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%