Evaluation of viewing experiences induced by curved 3D display

Mun, Sungchul; Park, Min-Chul; Yano, Sumio

doi:10.1117/12.2179436

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The signal monitored in the two brain regions react differently to the presented stimuli. The perceptual related areas react with a delay of about 500 to 700ms later in the NC then in the C condition, which might be explained by the higher cognitive workload needed in the NC condition [14]. The visual related areas react to the stimuli between 300 and 500ms with approximately 1µV higher values for the C then for the NC condition.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Estimating Visual Discomfort in Head-Mounted Displays Using Electroencephalography

Maï

Hassib

Königbauer

2017

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Head-Mounted displays, while providing unprecedented immersiveness and engagement in interaction, can substantially add mental workload and visual strain on users. Being a novel technology, users often do not know what to expect and therefore accept visual stress as being state of the art. Assessing visual discomfort is currently possible through questionnaires and interviews that interrupt the interaction and provide only subjective feedback. Electroencephalography (EEG) can provide insights about the visual discomfort and workload of HMDs. We evaluate the use of a consumer-grade Brain Computer Interface for estimating visual discomfort in HMD usage in a study with 24 participants. Our results show that the usage of a BCI to detect uncomfortable viewing conditions is possible with a certainty of 83% in our study. Further the results give insights on the usage of BCIs in order to increase the detection certainty by reducing costs for the hardware. This can pave the way for designing adaptive virtual reality experiences that consider user visual fatigue without disrupting immersiveness.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 96%

Estimating Visual Discomfort in Head-Mounted Displays Using Electroencephalography

Maï

Hassib

Königbauer

2017

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the case of large‐sized displays like televisions, this issue becomes a more severe problem because there is a large difference between the distance from the viewer's eyes to the center of display and the viewer's eyes to the edge of display. Curved displays were recently introduced to the market, emphasizing greater visual comfort and more immersive viewing experience in comparison with flat displays . At certain viewing positions, curved displays provide a constant viewing distance between the eyes and display as schematically illustrated in Fig.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Curved displays were recently introduced to the market, emphasizing greater visual comfort and more immersive viewing experience in comparison with flat displays. 2,3 At certain viewing positions, curved displays provide a constant viewing distance between the eyes and display as schematically illustrated in Fig. 1, and it enables viewers to concentrate on watching and help them feel more comfortable.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Preference survey of curvature of large-size displays

Suk

2016

Jnl Soc Info Display

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the aesthetic judgment of large‐size curved displays and found out the most preferred radius of them. For the survey, 1:1 scale curved display mock‐ups were presented to subjects, and the displays were made of acrylic frame with various sizes and curvatures. The subjects were asked to assess their preference for the displays in both aesthetic appeal and visual comfort at a distance of 2.5 m. The survey results showed that the most preferred radius of curvature varies depending on the display size, and it increases as the display size becomes larger. For 55‐in. displays, the most preferred radius of curvature was found as 2000 mm across the contents attached on the displays. With regard to the 65‐ and 75‐in. displays, the subjects' preference was increased to 3000 mm that lightly varied depending on the presented contents.

show abstract

Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR Displays

Sultana,

Alam

2024

Graphics Interface

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Evaluation of viewing experiences induced by curved 3D display

Cited by 3 publications

References 17 publications

Estimating Visual Discomfort in Head-Mounted Displays Using Electroencephalography

Estimating Visual Discomfort in Head-Mounted Displays Using Electroencephalography

Preference survey of curvature of large-size displays

Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR Displays

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About