2020
DOI: 10.2112/jcr-si105-031.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Water Resources Carrying Capacity in Jiangxi Province Based on Principal Component Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One is to use a comprehensive technique to assess WRCC. Approaches include principal component analysis (Hu et al 2020), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (Abedi-Koupai et al 2022;Feng et al 2020), and fuzzy set pair analysis (Zhang et al 2020). Therefore, combined with the TOPSIS model, the combined weighted TOPSIS model (Sun et al 2020) was further developed to assess WRCC.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One is to use a comprehensive technique to assess WRCC. Approaches include principal component analysis (Hu et al 2020), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (Abedi-Koupai et al 2022;Feng et al 2020), and fuzzy set pair analysis (Zhang et al 2020). Therefore, combined with the TOPSIS model, the combined weighted TOPSIS model (Sun et al 2020) was further developed to assess WRCC.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of time selection, most studies have investigated regional WRCC in the current year (Xu et al 2022) or predicted future WRCC (Yan and Xu 2022). In terms of method selection and model construction, most research has used a comprehensive evaluation model for regional WRCC analysis (Hu et al 2020) without fully considering the limitations of indicator weight determination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the deepening of research, the evaluation methods of water resources carrying capacity are improving day by day. A variety of model methods have gradually emerged, such as principal component analysis [5,6] , matter-element model [7,8] , projection pursuit [9,10] , fuzzy evaluation [11][12][13] , multi-objective decision [14][15][16] , water footprint theory [17][18][19] , system dynamics method (SD) [20][21] . With the improvement of the theoretical system, the comprehensive method coupled model evaluation system [22,23] has been further improved, such as DPSIR model [24] , PSR model [25,26] , quality-domain-flow model [27][28] and multi-dimensional cloud model [29][30][31][32] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When superior tourism resources are fully utilized and become tourism attractions, it will become the iconic image of the tourist destination, improve tourism awareness, and bring huge passenger flow to it. At present, the research on tourism resource attraction mainly focuses on the evaluation of tourism resource attraction from the perspectives of IPA analysis [7,8], AHP analysis [9], tourist perception perspective [10,11], network information [12], etc., constructing tourism resource attraction model [13], and exploring its spatial structure characteristics [14]. Proposed the path to enhance the attraction of tourism resources [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%