2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of weather datasets for building energy simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, typical years are also necessary for assessing the building energy performance under standard weather reference conditions, which are expected to be representative of the multi-year series in a given location. Some previous studies observed that the variability of buildings annual energy uses are less than 10 % in the multi-year period -between 4 % and 6 % for U.S. climates [8,9] or 4.6 % for Hong-Kong [10]. Although the previous studies are valid only for the climatic context and buildings analysed, they indicate that a single reference year can generally be used to express the typical energy performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Eventually, typical years are also necessary for assessing the building energy performance under standard weather reference conditions, which are expected to be representative of the multi-year series in a given location. Some previous studies observed that the variability of buildings annual energy uses are less than 10 % in the multi-year period -between 4 % and 6 % for U.S. climates [8,9] or 4.6 % for Hong-Kong [10]. Although the previous studies are valid only for the climatic context and buildings analysed, they indicate that a single reference year can generally be used to express the typical energy performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Significant variations in simulated energy use from the two different weather periods were found and weather data covering more recent periods were recommended to be used for better prediction of actual energy use in buildings. Bhandari et al [19] studied the quality of weather data from two different sources by comparing them to actual measured weather data, and the associated impact on building cooling and heating loads and energy consumption for a single year at a specific U.S. location.…”
Section: Discrepancies Of Weather Data From Different Sources and Difmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate estimation of building performance relies on the appropriate selection of accurate weather data. The quality of weather data and their impact on building cooling and heating loads and energy consumption were studied by comparing three weather datasets for a specific location for the calendar year 2010 [19]. The three sources of data included site measured data and AMY weather data provided by two vendors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this particular case, the database used for the training of the feedforward neural network is based on the study done by the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, located in Oak Ridge, Tennessee [18]. This study analyzed the meteorological factors of dry bulb temperature, global horizontal irradiance, wind speed, dew point temperature, wind direction and relative humidity for the year 2010, and their relation with the energy consumption of a building.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%