2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of welfare functions of environmental amenities: A case of forest biomass fuels in Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence for the importance of cultural and socio‐economic factors, including economic incentives, in determining the adoption of conservation measures across various segments of society and various stakeholders (e.g. Durrant, 2004; Kijazi & Kant, 2011b; Kilima et al, 2014; Noe, 2014) further points to the need for societal participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence for the importance of cultural and socio‐economic factors, including economic incentives, in determining the adoption of conservation measures across various segments of society and various stakeholders (e.g. Durrant, 2004; Kijazi & Kant, 2011b; Kilima et al, 2014; Noe, 2014) further points to the need for societal participation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy production from biomass is essential to achieve the existing energy and environmental goals (Suh, 2017). The consumption of energy from biomass can rouse financial development via creating new professions while also reducing the dependence of several countries on the import of fossil fuels (Al-Mulali et al, 2016), as well as many other advantages (Bandyopadhyay et al, 2011;Kijazi and Kant, 2011;Rovere et al, 2011).…”
Section: Potential Of Agricultural Residues For Bioenergy Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the SUA research regulation and guidelines of 2019 and TARI Act of 2016 both emphasize the preservation of research data and other research materials but the documents are silent on methods of data preservation for ensuring long-term data access, sharing, and future reuse (DPRTC, 2019; URT, 2016). Despite previous literature available on data preservation in the study area (Agrawal, 2017; Chidi, 2017; FAO, 2017; Katabalwa et al, 2021; Kijazi, 2018; Mboera, 2015; Mushi et al, 2020; NBS, 2010; TMA, 2020), however, there is a paucity of information on agricultural research data preservation in agricultural research institutions in Tanzania. This study, therefore, aims at closing this information gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%