2013
DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v14i4.4163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of whole‐body MR to CT deformable image registration

Abstract: Multimodality image registration plays a crucial role in various clinical and research applications. The aim of this study is to present an optimized MR to CT whole‐body deformable image registration algorithm and its validation using clinical studies. A 3D intermodality registration technique based on B‐spline transformation was performed using optimized parameters of the elastix package based on the Insight Toolkit (ITK) framework. Twenty‐eight (17 male and 11 female) clinical studies were used in this work.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to temporal separation between MRI and CT acquisitions, in-phase MRI were deformably registered to the corresponding CT images using the Elastix framework based on the ITK library ( Klein et al, 2010 ) using a combination of rigid registration based on maximum mutual information and non-rigid registration as described previously ( Akbarzadeh et al, 2013 ). MRI and CT acquisitions were performed with the same patient positioning to minimize non-rigid deformation.…”
Section: Pet/ct and Pet/mr Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to temporal separation between MRI and CT acquisitions, in-phase MRI were deformably registered to the corresponding CT images using the Elastix framework based on the ITK library ( Klein et al, 2010 ) using a combination of rigid registration based on maximum mutual information and non-rigid registration as described previously ( Akbarzadeh et al, 2013 ). MRI and CT acquisitions were performed with the same patient positioning to minimize non-rigid deformation.…”
Section: Pet/ct and Pet/mr Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22) patients are non-rigidly warped to the coordinates of the target image. Image registration was carried out using the Elastix package (based on the ITK library) ( Klein et al, 2010 ) through a combination of affine and non-rigid alignment based on the advanced Mattes mutual information as described in previous work ( Akbarzadeh et al, 2013 ). The following parameters were adopted: interpolate: Bspline, optimizer: standard gradient descent, image pyramid schedule: (16 8 4 2 2), grid spacing schedule (32.0 16.0 8.0 4.0 2.0), maximum number of iterations (4096 4096 2048 1024 512), number of histogram bins: 32.…”
Section: Label Fusion Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registration process was carried out through a combination of affine and nonrigid alignment based on the advanced Mattes mutual information 34 implemented in the Elastix package 35 as described in previous studies. 36,37 The following parameters were adopted: interpolate: B-spline, optimizer: standard gradient descent, image pyramid schedule: (16 8 4 2 2 in terms of Dice similarity coefficient. This procedure was repeated for the whole dataset and the optimal sizes of R and patch windows were chosen for the rest of the study (Fig.…”
Section: C Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introducing a thorough concept that guarantees the accuracy of the registration procedure in non-rigid organs proved to be a difficult task ( Murphy et al, 2011 ). In this work, we relied on a registration procedure validated in a previous work by our group ( Akbarzadeh et al, 2013 ) using the elastix software ( Klein et al, 2009 ). The alignment was performed by combining rigid and non-rigid registration based on normalized mutual information criterion using B-spline interpolator with an adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimizer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%