2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of work-as-done in information management of multidisciplinary incident management teams via Interaction Episode Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to address these specific challenges of a pandemic at the municipal, district, state, and national levels, teams of experts are employed that integrate different fields of expertise and professional backgrounds. Such crisis management teams (CMTs) usually consist of various sub‐teams organized in different subject areas, each responsible for specific aspects, such as situation analysis , action planning , operations , logistics and supply , finance and administration , or press and media relations (Bigley & Roberts, 2001; Heath, 1998; Son, Sasangohar, Neville, Peres, & Moon, 2020). Moreover, public CMTs are organized through civil protection and disaster control structures and are headed by top‐level managers of the organization, sometimes even by mayors, county administrators, district commissioners or prime ministers themselves.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to address these specific challenges of a pandemic at the municipal, district, state, and national levels, teams of experts are employed that integrate different fields of expertise and professional backgrounds. Such crisis management teams (CMTs) usually consist of various sub‐teams organized in different subject areas, each responsible for specific aspects, such as situation analysis , action planning , operations , logistics and supply , finance and administration , or press and media relations (Bigley & Roberts, 2001; Heath, 1998; Son, Sasangohar, Neville, Peres, & Moon, 2020). Moreover, public CMTs are organized through civil protection and disaster control structures and are headed by top‐level managers of the organization, sometimes even by mayors, county administrators, district commissioners or prime ministers themselves.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another challenge, CMTs are often large (15 to 25 members) and purposely composed of members with heterogeneous experience, hierarchy/status, knowledge, and backgrounds (e.g., Jehn & Techakesari, 2014; Moon et al, 2020). Such multidisciplinary, diverse teams are required for optimal adaptability to new situations and, therefore, are key to successful CMT work (Kendra & Wachtendorf, 2003; Son et al, 2020). However, because of this high disciplinary diversity, CMTs often have difficulties with communication and team processes (e.g., Bui, Chau, Degl'Innocenti, Leone, & Vicentini, 2019; Jehn & Techakesari, 2014; Joshi & Roh, 2009).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the importance of systemwide coordination and collaboration, resilience has been investigated through the lens of communication and interaction between system elements as the unit of analysis. Recent efforts have investigated communication patterns among emergency management personnel to identify overloads and bottlenecks (Gomes et al, 2014); adaptations to inadequate emergency procedures (Cabrera Aguilera et al, 2016;Son et al, 2020a); and interaction episode analyses to investigate content, context, and characteristics of interactions between system elements to identify cases in which adaptation and improvisation has resulted in increased system's capacity to respond (Son et al, 2020b). Recent work has also shown the utility of methods such as Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) and the Systems Ambiguity Framework (SAF) to enable proactive risk assessment and improve preparedness to respond (Gurses et al, 2020).…”
Section: Utilizing Systems Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Не зважаючи на те, що стійкість в управлінні надзвичайними ситуаціями широко вивчалася в багатьох контекстах надзвичайних ситуацій, розробка нового методу дослідження фактичної стійкості управління інцидентами в реальних умовах була недовершеною. З метою усунення зазначеного недоліку авторами вперше введено аналіз епізодів взаємодії, що передбачає новий підхід до фіксації та опису результативності командної роботи [4] [8].…”
unclassified