2011
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.681
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of workplace based assessment tools in dental foundation training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another result, which has to be discussed, is the low number of workplace‐based assessments, although the clinical courses in the last 2 years of the curriculum, where the students treat their own patients under supervision of dental instructors, gives an ideal platform for that type of assessment. It could be hypothesised that WBA is not enough known in dentistry, and instruments which are already used in postgraduate dental training have not found their way into undergraduate education yet . Asking whether the contents are based on any catalogues of learning objectives, only one university mentioned the existing ‘Profile and Competences for the European Dentist’ by the Association of Dental Education in Europe (available since 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another result, which has to be discussed, is the low number of workplace‐based assessments, although the clinical courses in the last 2 years of the curriculum, where the students treat their own patients under supervision of dental instructors, gives an ideal platform for that type of assessment. It could be hypothesised that WBA is not enough known in dentistry, and instruments which are already used in postgraduate dental training have not found their way into undergraduate education yet . Asking whether the contents are based on any catalogues of learning objectives, only one university mentioned the existing ‘Profile and Competences for the European Dentist’ by the Association of Dental Education in Europe (available since 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature supports the value of workplace based study as a rich source for learning (Grieveson, Kirton, Palmer, & Balmer, 2011;Poell & VanWoerkom, 2011;Fortune & McKinstry, 2012) . Students in this study valued the opportunity to work and study, to improve their performance whilst implementing their new found knowledge to educate others and to change practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two students indicated the need for more informative and online activities, highlighting the significant role of workplace based learning as part of the professional's experiential learning (Grieveson et al, 2011) and the value of feedback to deepen students' learning (Al-Kadri, Al-Kadi, & Van Der Vleuten, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the contrary, only one fourth of mentees believe in that as a realistic assessment tool (Figure 4). Literature has suggested that improved academic grades, knowledge and skills learned, attendance rates, enhanced self-esteem, improving communication skills, and decreasing incidents of questioning and warning letters are all possible measure tools that could be used in mentorship process [9]. The bottom-line is that success of the mentee is always an indicator of successful mentorship [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%