2015
DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2015.556-560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Yucca schidigera extract as feed additive on performance of broiler chicks in winter season

Abstract: Aim:Yucca schidigera extract has been successfully used as feed additives in the poultry industry. It enhances the growth and productivity in broiler production. Hence, the present study was designed to analyze the effect of Y. schidigera extract in growth, carcass quality and behavior along with its economical utility in broiler rearing.Materials and Methods:Total, 120 numbers of day-old broiler chicks of equal sex ratio were randomly divided into Yucca supplemented treatment and control group, each having 60… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
43
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The chemical analyses of the complete diets were similar to the intended formulation (Tables 2 and 3); however, the chemical analysis for Cu concentration was slightly higher than expected for diets formulated to contain 75 and 150, ppm of added Cu from Cu-AA (AAFCO, 2014 11 ). Analytical variation for Cu is listed at 25% (AAFCO,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The chemical analyses of the complete diets were similar to the intended formulation (Tables 2 and 3); however, the chemical analysis for Cu concentration was slightly higher than expected for diets formulated to contain 75 and 150, ppm of added Cu from Cu-AA (AAFCO, 2014 11 ). Analytical variation for Cu is listed at 25% (AAFCO,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Surfaces included: 1) stainless steel (stainless steel type 316; Built-So-Well Manhattan, KS); 2) plastic (Dura Bucket National Oats Co. Collinsville, Ill.); 3) rubber (Maxi-Lift Inc. Addison, TX); 4) woven polypropylene tote bag (The MegaSack Corp. Magnolia, AR); and 5) sealed concrete (Quikrete Co. Atlanta, GA). Chemical treatments included: 1) no sanitation treatment (control); 2) untreated rice hulls; 3) rice hulls treated with formaldehyde-based commercial product (Sal CURB; Kemin Inc., Des Moines, IA; 30% formaldehyde and 10% propionic acid/methanol blend); 4) liquid formaldehyde-based commercial product (Sal CURB; Kemin Inc., Des Moines, IA); 5) dry commercial benzoic acid and probiotic blend (VevoVitall and CRINA; DSM Nutritional Products Inc., Parsippany, NJ; 96% benzoic acid and 4% probiotic blend); 6) liquid commercial food-grade sanitizer (DrySan Duo; Ecolab, St. Paul, MN; 10.98% isopropyl alcohol, 0.045% hydrogen peroxide, 0.016% alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, 0.007% dodecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, and 0.005% dioctyl dimethyl ammonium chloride); 7) 3% dilution of liquid hydrogen peroxide commercial product (INTERvention; Virox Technologies Inc. Ontario, Canada; 4.25% hydrogen peroxide); 8) 0.39% dilution of liquid quaternary ammonium glutaraldehyde commercial product (Synergize; Preserve International, Reno NV; 26.0% alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride and 7% glutaraldehyde); 9) 10% dilution of liquid sodium hypochlorite commercial sanitizer (Bleach; The Chlorox Company, Oakland, CA; 5 to 10% sodium hypochlorite); and 10) liquid medium chain fatty acid blend of caprylic, caproic, and capric acids (1:1:1 custom blend 11 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations