2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of zirconium as a permanent chemical modifier using synchrotron radiation and imaging techniques for lithium determination in sediment slurry samples by ET AAS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in the presence of a sulfate-containing matrix capable of reacting with PGMs, the best modifier is Pd. Flores et al 260 used synchrotron radiation XRF and SEM for the evaluation of Zr as a permanent chemical modifier for Li determination in slurry samples by ETAAS. Results were used to determine optimal conditions for the analysis of sediment samples.…”
Section: Furnacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the presence of a sulfate-containing matrix capable of reacting with PGMs, the best modifier is Pd. Flores et al 260 used synchrotron radiation XRF and SEM for the evaluation of Zr as a permanent chemical modifier for Li determination in slurry samples by ETAAS. Results were used to determine optimal conditions for the analysis of sediment samples.…”
Section: Furnacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the level of toxicity has been found to be moderately low in both histological and cytological studies [3]. In analytical chemistry, zirconium is consumed as an absorption modifier in ET-AAS alone [4] or with other modifiers [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, other Pt group metals 5 and metals that form highmelting carbides or oxides, such as zirconium, have found favour as permanent modifiers that produce a longer lasting coating on the graphite tube or platform. [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] It has been shown, through various studies, that the permanent modification approach suffers from certain drawbacks as well as providing some successes [13][14][15][16][17][18] in ETAAS, with different and even contradictory mechanisms of the analyte modification process proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%