2017
DOI: 10.14233/ajchem.2017.20728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Performance of Molecularly Imprinted Polymer Prepared by Two Different Polymerization Method for Atenolol Recognition in Human Plasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1b) and found out that the binding affinity between MAA-ATE is À1.5 kcal/mol. This affinity is lower than ATE-ITA and has a good correlation with our previous result [23] that having lower recovery percentage than ATE-ITA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b) and found out that the binding affinity between MAA-ATE is À1.5 kcal/mol. This affinity is lower than ATE-ITA and has a good correlation with our previous result [23] that having lower recovery percentage than ATE-ITA.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…According to other researcher results, our laboratory has previously made MI-SPE for ATE [23] using methacrylic acid as a functional monomer with recoveries above 90%, but there is a lack of imprinting factor compared to the non-molecular imprinted polymer (NIP). Therefore, in this study, we wish to report on the development of MI-SPE materials for the rapid pre-concentration and clean-up of ATE in biological fluid samples before HPLC analysis using ITA as the other functional monomer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study synthesising MIP with MAA monomers using methanol as a porogen, the resulting adsorption capacity values were still low because the bonds between the analyte and template were not strong [9]. e choice of propanol as a porogen is based on the lower polarity (dielectric constant � 20.1) than methanol (dielectric constant � 33.0); thus, macropores are not formed, and hydrogen bonding is facilitated.…”
Section: Synthesis Of the Imprinted Monolithic Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance characterisation was carried out on the four monolithic columns using the most optimal mobile phase, followed by determination of the chromatographic parameters. Analysis of atenolol in a previous study used isocratic elution with a mobile phase of methanol: 0.05% TEA pH 3 (15 : 85 v/v) [9]. Chromatographic profiles of the imprinted monolithic column using isocratic elution can be seen in Table 3.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Analytical Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation