2020
DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation Tools for Interdisciplinary Palliative Care Learning Experiences: A Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are currently under consideration by our team for future evaluation of our program. A literature reviewed executed by Thiel et al (2020) has identified the lack of evaluation tools to assess changes in clinicians’ knowledge, skills and attitudes related to palliative care after participating in interdisciplinary learning experiences 23 . An evaluation of the frequency of utilization of our education and clinical support tools by our emergency staff is proposed as a good starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are currently under consideration by our team for future evaluation of our program. A literature reviewed executed by Thiel et al (2020) has identified the lack of evaluation tools to assess changes in clinicians’ knowledge, skills and attitudes related to palliative care after participating in interdisciplinary learning experiences 23 . An evaluation of the frequency of utilization of our education and clinical support tools by our emergency staff is proposed as a good starting point.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each tool discovered in the literature was evaluated ( Table 1 ); however, no one tool was found to be adequate for interprofessional learners of clinical experiences. 12 Therefore, the team opted to create a new evaluation tool ( Appendix A1 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an interprofessional team began to create an online curriculum for all learners to engage with and sought out an evaluation tool to measure the change in knowledge, skills, and attitudes among interprofessional learners; when they did not find a fitting tool, created one themselves. 12 (Do) The pre-/post-test was administered primarily through e-mail and Qualtrics, with a few in paper form. Data were collected for a period of approximately six months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Competence level can be assessed in terms of objective knowledge, which is usually tested impartially discipline-specifically, and perceived knowledge which refers to subjective cognitive appraisals (Thiel et al, 2019). As EoLC competence involves a range of knowledge and attitudes which it might be difficult to capture by simple tests, many of the assessment tools used to measure professionals’ competence level in the existing literature involved self-reported or perceived competences (see review by Thiel et al, 2019). Subjective competence or perceived competence is a key psychological construct in an individual's motivation system and self-conception (Marsh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%