“…The necessity of adjusting the initial formula for calculating the indicator and transforming it into formula (1) by substantiating a more accurate account of the influence of private indicators on the final result has been proved: the reproduction rate of a young specialist (graduate) as a labor resource (Krirys (g) i); coefficient of the reproductive and stimulating labor function of a young specialist (graduate) (Krsys (g) i). To eliminate the problems of regular application of Formula 1 as a state instrument for regulating the employment of young specialists (graduates), in our opinion, it is necessary in the statistical records of the country to single out the category of labor force -"young specialist In our opinion, it is advisable to combine the proposed model with the approved author's approach to the formation of transaction costs of the state (Lobanova et al, 2020) in the form of a dynamic model of transformation of transaction costs of the state by the "entry" of graduates (young specialists) into the labor sphere, which will allow more accurately and substantively assess the impact of state instruments to support the employment of young specialists (graduates) in the regions that require support from the state in these (Lobanova et al, 2020). The state of the potential for effective employment in this subject, assessed by means of the integral indicator of the specific labor efficiency of a young specialist (graduate), was 0.0166 in 2017, and already in 2018 caused a dynamic to deteriorate through an increase in the indicator to 0.0182 (table one).…”