“…Peerfeedback can be facilitated by tasking students to act as 'buddies', to check on each others' work (Musgrove, 2023). The intention of self-assessment rubrics are a means to allow students interact with the assessment criteria, so that they can make more meaningful relations between feedback and learning Including assessment of laboratory skills where appropriate (Hensiek et al, 2017;Seery et al, 2017;Hancock and Hollamby, 2020) Shared rubrics (Veale et al, 2020) as well as specification grading (Pullen et al, 2018;McKnelly et al, 2023) and engaging students in consideration of assessment processes (Bertram and Tomas, 2023) can all help in clarifying and aligning assessment processes Rubrics for critical thinking skills shared with students can help foster awareness of what is assessed in this aspect of laboratory work (Reynders et al, 2020) Include opportunities for self-and peer assessment (Taylor et al, 2009;Lau, 2020) to help make assessment approaches tangible Structure students' work in building capacity to write laboratory reports, including where intended the production of research project reports Include activities to help students learn and be assessed on particular aspects of laboratory work (Deiner et al, 2012;Capel et al, 2019) Support assessment of the broader generation and contribution to group-produced work through, for example, the use of a wiki (Lawrie et al, 2016) outcomes. Bertram and Tomas (2023) extended this idea to incorporate evaluative judgements in a large project-based course, resulting in a series of feedback reflection stages in curriculum delivery, where students compared their selfassessment with instructor feedback, with action planning for future work incorporated as a means to help students take actionable steps for how they would approach their next activity, or future work.…”