2017
DOI: 10.1080/14708477.2017.1378227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluative language for rapport building in virtual collaboration: an analysis of appraisal in computer-mediated interaction

Abstract: https://repositorio.uam.es Esta es la versión de autor del artículo publicado en: This is an author produced version of a paper published in:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
11
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong points outweigh the weak points, as students show positive perceptions of their telecollaborative projects, seen as a way of developing their competencies and enriching their learning experience, a finding aligned with previous research on telecollaboration (Ferreira et al, 2018;Kohn & Hoffstaedter, 2017) where students show high levels of engagement, building rapport at a distance (Vinagre & Esteban, 2018). Other responses referred to the specifics of the different projects rather than telecollaboration in general.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The strong points outweigh the weak points, as students show positive perceptions of their telecollaborative projects, seen as a way of developing their competencies and enriching their learning experience, a finding aligned with previous research on telecollaboration (Ferreira et al, 2018;Kohn & Hoffstaedter, 2017) where students show high levels of engagement, building rapport at a distance (Vinagre & Esteban, 2018). Other responses referred to the specifics of the different projects rather than telecollaboration in general.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysissupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Finally, teachers implementing an inquiry-based telecollaboration should be prepared to resolve not only instructional, cognitive, and socio-linguistic challenges when they arise but also the issues stemming from diverse levels of digital literacies among students participating in the exchanges (O'Dowd & Dooly, 2020). Therefore, teachers need to choose the appropriate technologies and digital tools to fit both the students' everyday online practices and the telecollaborative project's objectives (Vinagre & Corral, 2018). Also, teachers should be able to organise and structure realtime student interaction considering the specific affordances and technicalities of synchronous tools such as Zoom, Skype or Microsoft Teams.…”
Section: Pedagogical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plausible explanation for these findings could be that students in the control group tended to focus more on the task itself, on what and how they wrote it, and at the same time they reflected more on the format and wording of their final joint essay. The experimental group, on the other hand, seemed to focus more on the collaborative interaction than on the task, as can be deduced from their levels of confidence and positivity (Vinagre & Corral, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%