2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2006.01.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evanescently coupled dewpoint sensor based on a silicon waveguide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The developed QCM dew/frost sensor has measurement errors of < ±0.2 • C at temperatures greater than −60 • C, as compared with ±0.2 • C for optical dew-point hygrometers [25] and ±0.3 • C ∼ ±0.5 • C for other types of dewpoint detectors, e.g. laser dew-point hygrometers [27,28], impedance dew-point detectors [29] and evanescent field detection techniques [30]. This demonstrates that the QCM dew/frost-point sensor has similar accuracy to other dewpoint sensors for temperatures greater than −60 • C. In contrast, while optical dew-point hygrometers exhibit poor performance, low sensitivity due to the optical detection limit and long response time, etc, at dew/frost points below −70 • C (even though some commercial optical chilled mirror hygrometers show good accuracy of ± 0.1 • C in the range below −70 • C), the QCM dew/frost-point sensor we have developed maintains reasonable accuracy even for very low dew/frost points with errors in the range ±0.…”
Section: Dew/frost-point Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The developed QCM dew/frost sensor has measurement errors of < ±0.2 • C at temperatures greater than −60 • C, as compared with ±0.2 • C for optical dew-point hygrometers [25] and ±0.3 • C ∼ ±0.5 • C for other types of dewpoint detectors, e.g. laser dew-point hygrometers [27,28], impedance dew-point detectors [29] and evanescent field detection techniques [30]. This demonstrates that the QCM dew/frost-point sensor has similar accuracy to other dewpoint sensors for temperatures greater than −60 • C. In contrast, while optical dew-point hygrometers exhibit poor performance, low sensitivity due to the optical detection limit and long response time, etc, at dew/frost points below −70 • C (even though some commercial optical chilled mirror hygrometers show good accuracy of ± 0.1 • C in the range below −70 • C), the QCM dew/frost-point sensor we have developed maintains reasonable accuracy even for very low dew/frost points with errors in the range ±0.…”
Section: Dew/frost-point Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A condensation-principle hygrometer operates by detecting the formation of condensed water or ice on a temperaturecontrolled surface. Previous studies [15,16] have shown that the initial condensate typically forms a uniform layer of droplets that are a few micrometres in size. In this section we consider the effect of surface droplets on the frequencies f TM 1n and f TE 1n , and hence derive a formula for estimating the volume of water on the internal surface of a QSR from the ratio f TM 1n / f TE 1n .…”
Section: Effect Of a Surface Condensate On The Resonance Frequencies ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So there is a strong demand for a sensor able to accurately detect a high humidity or dew condensation state. Different dew point hygrometers reported to date are based on resistive [2], capacitive [3], gravimetric [4], surface acoustic wave [5] or optical [6]- [10] technologies. Optical fibers are used to launch and collect optical signal from the condensation surface of chilled mirror hygrometers [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%