1994
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/270.4.734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation of brown dwarfs in AGB envelopes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several good candidates for sub-stellar companions in CVs, but the extra light due to accretion makes it difficult to confirm their masses. 14, 15 3 Short period white dwarfs binaries with low mass companions that do not transfer mass are known as pre-CVs because the loss of orbital angular momentum by gravitational wave radiation (GWR) and other mechanisms will result in the shrinkage of the orbit, the initiation of mass transfer and the formation of a CV. 16 The timescale for WD0137-349 to become a CV through the loss of GWR is about 1.4Ga, at which time the orbit period will be 60 -80 minutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several good candidates for sub-stellar companions in CVs, but the extra light due to accretion makes it difficult to confirm their masses. 14, 15 3 Short period white dwarfs binaries with low mass companions that do not transfer mass are known as pre-CVs because the loss of orbital angular momentum by gravitational wave radiation (GWR) and other mechanisms will result in the shrinkage of the orbit, the initiation of mass transfer and the formation of a CV. 16 The timescale for WD0137-349 to become a CV through the loss of GWR is about 1.4Ga, at which time the orbit period will be 60 -80 minutes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…v տ v Ӎ 10 km s rot w nous to singly evolved AGB stars and requires the AGB to be spun up by a companion at least as massive as a brown dwarf (Harpaz & Soker 1994). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) In the above listed studies the contribution of the planet to the ejected mass was lower than half. The largest contribution of the planet mass is in the calculations of Harpaz & Soker (1994), where for four cases a planet of mass 0.01M ⊙ was destroyed inside an AGB envelope of mass 0.02M ⊙ . (2) The planet in these studied were destroyed near a hot core that still has a hydrogen burning in a shell.…”
Section: Real Planetary Nebula (Rpn) Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%