2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.101.024611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaporation residue measurements of compound nuclei in the A200 region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many theoretical and experimental studies have been carried out to analyze the decay of various light and heavy mass compound nuclei at energies around the Coulomb barrier [1][2][3]. Recently, the nuclear reaction investigation at energies far above the Coulomb barrier has gain momentum due to advancement in the experimental techniques [4][5][6] and has opened many interesting questions for exploration at this fermi range physics. Therefore, it is interesting to study a nuclear reaction dynamic at energy much above the Coulomb barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many theoretical and experimental studies have been carried out to analyze the decay of various light and heavy mass compound nuclei at energies around the Coulomb barrier [1][2][3]. Recently, the nuclear reaction investigation at energies far above the Coulomb barrier has gain momentum due to advancement in the experimental techniques [4][5][6] and has opened many interesting questions for exploration at this fermi range physics. Therefore, it is interesting to study a nuclear reaction dynamic at energy much above the Coulomb barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behaviour of preformation probability P 0 and scattering potential V(R) is analysed, respectively, to examine the mass distributions and barrier characteristics by opting for different nuclear radii choices. The fusion-fission cross sections σ FFs ( )are calculated using the neck-length parameter for all considered radius choices and compared with the experimental data [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%