Evapotranspiration - Remote Sensing and Modeling 2012
DOI: 10.5772/17042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evapotranspiration Estimation Based on the Complementary Relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Granger [1989] provided an unambiguous definition of D Ã in this context, some researchers have interpreted it as the slope of saturated vapor pressure at air temperature [e.g., Venturini et al, 2012]. The crucial point here is that D Ã is defined using two unknowns, the drying surface temperature (T s ) and the hypothetical wet surface temperature (T w ) and both must be specified in this version of the asymmetrical complementary relationship.…”
Section: Previous Derivations Of the Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Granger [1989] provided an unambiguous definition of D Ã in this context, some researchers have interpreted it as the slope of saturated vapor pressure at air temperature [e.g., Venturini et al, 2012]. The crucial point here is that D Ã is defined using two unknowns, the drying surface temperature (T s ) and the hypothetical wet surface temperature (T w ) and both must be specified in this version of the asymmetrical complementary relationship.…”
Section: Previous Derivations Of the Crmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it is not the scope of this work to analyse the sensitivity of CR to small changes in k , we compare the aforementioned k with those published in the literature (Ramirez et al ., ; Venturini et al ., ). Although ET H&S matches the averaged recharge better than ET Turc , the k = 2.17 is comparable with those published, whereas k = 2.3 is a little larger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we have one equation (A7) and two unknowns (s 1 and s 3 ), which is not uniquely solvable using the assumptions and the iterative procedure described in Venturini et al [2008] as adopted by Mallick et al [2014]. However, in a more recent follow up study, Venturini et al [2012] proposed a simplified method of T SD estimation. Following Venturini et al [2012], we similarly revise some aspects of T SD estimation in the present analysis, by directly assigning s 3 as a function of T R and s 1 as a function of T D , the general form of which is s54098 6:108e 17:27T ðT1237:3Þ ðT1237:3Þ 2 !…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in a more recent follow up study, Venturini et al [2012] proposed a simplified method of T SD estimation. Following Venturini et al [2012], we similarly revise some aspects of T SD estimation in the present analysis, by directly assigning s 3 as a function of T R and s 1 as a function of T D , the general form of which is s54098 6:108e 17:27T ðT1237:3Þ ðT1237:3Þ 2 ! .…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%