2017
DOI: 10.3384/cu.2000.1525.179162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even Better than the Real Thing? Digital Copies and Digital Museums in a Digital Cultural Policy

Abstract: This article investigates how a digital turn and digital copies have influenced ideas, roles and authorities within a national museum sector. It asks whether digital museums and their digital reproductions expand and/or challenge a traditional cultural policy. Two specific cases are highlighted to inform the discussion on these questions -the Norwegian digital museum platform DigitaltMuseum and Google Art Project. The article argues that there is a certain epochalism at play when the impact of a digital turn i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This applies to academic as well as popular discourses, which tend generally to be ripe with declarations about the era-defining and transformative consequences of digitalization. A similar tendency is detectable in the discourse on digitalization in the ALM-field, as already hinted to by Hylland (2017). The epochalist framing is revealed most clearly in the titles of some of the white papers, which allude to the present as an "age" of digitalization ("Sources of Knowledge and Experience: On archives, Libraries and Museums in an ICT-age", "Libraries: Public Knowledge, Meeting Place and Cultural Arena in a Digital Age"), and in the use of concepts such as "information society" and "digital society" in the documents.…”
Section: Journal Of Current Cultural Researchsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This applies to academic as well as popular discourses, which tend generally to be ripe with declarations about the era-defining and transformative consequences of digitalization. A similar tendency is detectable in the discourse on digitalization in the ALM-field, as already hinted to by Hylland (2017). The epochalist framing is revealed most clearly in the titles of some of the white papers, which allude to the present as an "age" of digitalization ("Sources of Knowledge and Experience: On archives, Libraries and Museums in an ICT-age", "Libraries: Public Knowledge, Meeting Place and Cultural Arena in a Digital Age"), and in the use of concepts such as "information society" and "digital society" in the documents.…”
Section: Journal Of Current Cultural Researchsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…There were other noteworthy suggestions extracted from the open-ended comments of the participants. For instance, one specifically expressed his/her expectation on a “warmer lighting” of the photos that could “simulate a virtual visit” to a physical museum (Participant #19), which denotes the importance of considering not only the quality of photos [ 28 ] but also visitors’ hedonic or affective experience during the digitization process [ 29 ].…”
Section: Evaluation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as valued is the process of making it accessible to visitors. According to Hylland (2017), around the same time that museums began providing digital content in 1995, the democratic potential of digital content was acknowledged by Norway in 1996. Research from Hylland (2017) explored how Norway views information technology as a potential method to make museum content more ac-cessible to the public.…”
Section: The Role Of Digital Content In Cultural Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research from Hylland (2017) explored how Norway views information technology as a potential method to make museum content more ac-cessible to the public. A report from the Auditor General of Norway asserted that one of the primary goals for digital cultural heritage is providing access (Hylland 2017). This large-scale acknowledgment of the significance of using digital content to provide access to cultural institutions indicates that not only should this content have a considerable impact on audience engagement but there should also be further discussion about making it the standard for cultural institutions beyond times of temporary closures.…”
Section: The Role Of Digital Content In Cultural Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%