1969
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(69)90006-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Even-odd differences and structure of the fission barriers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
205
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(213 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
7
205
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In complex nuclei, the lowenergy levels observed inside the gap can be interpreted as collective excitations, vibrational or/and rotational. As the collective phenomena of these types correspond typically to the slow self-consistent motion of many particles, it is natural to expect that such coherent combinations of single-particle excitations partly compensate the deficit of levels at low energy due to the pairing gaps and give rise to the so-called collective enhancement of the level density [22,47] in comparison to the single-particle combinatorics of independent particles and holes. Modern refined approaches of this class account in various forms for the pairing phenomenon that changes the excitation spectrum, especially in even-even nuclei [23][24][25].…”
Section: Shell-model Predictions and Mean-field Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In complex nuclei, the lowenergy levels observed inside the gap can be interpreted as collective excitations, vibrational or/and rotational. As the collective phenomena of these types correspond typically to the slow self-consistent motion of many particles, it is natural to expect that such coherent combinations of single-particle excitations partly compensate the deficit of levels at low energy due to the pairing gaps and give rise to the so-called collective enhancement of the level density [22,47] in comparison to the single-particle combinatorics of independent particles and holes. Modern refined approaches of this class account in various forms for the pairing phenomenon that changes the excitation spectrum, especially in even-even nuclei [23][24][25].…”
Section: Shell-model Predictions and Mean-field Combinatoricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pühlhofer model relies on the local Dilg et al parameterization [41] for excitation energies up to and slightly above the nucleon separation energy, while it interpolates then to a regime where the level-density parameter a becomes proportional to the nuclear mass number A. The Reisdorf approach builds on the generalized superfluid model by Ignatyuk et al [42], but it uses a global parameterization for the asymptotic level density parameter a. In one case [30], the level-density model by Fineman et al [43] is used in the data analysis.…”
Section: Statistical-model Calculations and Comparison To Experimentamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centrifugal energy arising from the angular momentum l of the rigid body is also considered. The temperature-dependent factor Φ is parameterized as Φ =exp{−aT 2 /E d } following the work of Ignatyuk et al (19). The shell dumping energy E d is chosen to be 20 MeV.…”
Section: The Multidimensional Langevin Equation Is Given Asmentioning
confidence: 99%