2017
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.3988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event‐based asynchronous communication and sampled control for synchronization of multiagent networks with input saturation

Abstract: This paper investigates the problem of event-based synchronization of linear dynamical networks subject to input saturation. The asynchronous neighboring information transmission is triggered by distributed events. The sampled control technique is utilized to exclude both the internal Zeno behavior of each agent and the network Zeno behavior attributed to neighboring agents. Allowing the input saturation to be attained, an event-based global synchronization algorithm is proposed for multiagent networks with ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(68 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the design approach in Theorem 3 can be applied to Lyapunov analysis for discrete‐time networks with switching topologies 36 If time delay is considered in agent dynamics and network information transmission, the Lyapunov analysis approach works well for networks with undirected graphs in References 8,9. For problem with digraphs, the error between the current states xifalse(tfalse)$$ {x}_i(t) $$ and the delayed states xifalse(tprefix−τfalse)$$ {x}_i\left(t-\tau \right) $$ may be taken into account in the Lyapunov analysis, and the delay‐dependent synchronizing conditions need to be analyzed, which will be studied in detail in the future.…”
Section: Discrete‐time Network Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the design approach in Theorem 3 can be applied to Lyapunov analysis for discrete‐time networks with switching topologies 36 If time delay is considered in agent dynamics and network information transmission, the Lyapunov analysis approach works well for networks with undirected graphs in References 8,9. For problem with digraphs, the error between the current states xifalse(tfalse)$$ {x}_i(t) $$ and the delayed states xifalse(tprefix−τfalse)$$ {x}_i\left(t-\tau \right) $$ may be taken into account in the Lyapunov analysis, and the delay‐dependent synchronizing conditions need to be analyzed, which will be studied in detail in the future.…”
Section: Discrete‐time Network Synchronizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MARE plays a fundamental role in synchronization of discrete-time networks. [1][2][3][4][5] The effective Lyapunov analysis approach can be used for event-triggered control of multi-agent networks with undirected fixed graphs [6][7][8][9] and sampled control of multi-agent networks with undirected switching graphs. 10 However, there is a lack of knowledge about the Lyapunov analysis of discrete-time networks with directed graphs and general linear dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, a PR controller is introduced to regulate the PCC voltage (V ) to its reference level by driving the difference between reference voltage V − and measured voltage V to zero. In addition to PR control, many other control methods, such as sliding-mode control [28,29], robust control [30], model predictive control [31,32], and event-triggered control [33] can also be considered in future studies based on the control strategy mentioned above.…”
Section: Control Design For Es-2mentioning
confidence: 99%