2011
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2011.584976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-Based Prospective Remembering in a Virtual World

Abstract: Most laboratory-based prospective memory (PM) paradigms pose problems that are very different from those encountered in the real world. Several PM studies have reported conflicting results when comparing laboratory- with naturalistic-based studies (e.g., Bailey, Henry, Rendell, Phillips, & Kliegel, 2010). One key contrast is that for the former, how and when the PM cue is encountered typically is determined by the experimenter, whereas in the latter case, cue availability is determined by participant actio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their mean age was 18.5 years (SD = 0.8 years). None of these participants had taken part in the previously published studies with EVET Trawley et al, 2011).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their mean age was 18.5 years (SD = 0.8 years). None of these participants had taken part in the previously published studies with EVET Trawley et al, 2011).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Logie and his colleagues have done multiple studies using a virtual environment (Law, Trawley, Brown, Stephens, & Logie, 2013;Trawley, Law, Brown, Niven, & Logie, 2014;Trawley, Law, & Logie, 2011). Trawley et al (2011) looked at whether planning ability and working memory capacity affected how well people did on a Virtual Errands Test, in which people were given a list of errands to complete in different locations throughout a four-floor building.…”
Section: Location Cues In the Prospective Memory Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trawley et al (2011) looked at whether planning ability and working memory capacity affected how well people did on a Virtual Errands Test, in which people were given a list of errands to complete in different locations throughout a four-floor building. Although people did have to remember to do tasks in particular locations, this study varied from traditional prospective memory studies in that there was no ongoing task with an embedded prospective memory task.…”
Section: Location Cues In the Prospective Memory Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For detailed analyses of timing in relation to the composition of clustered sequences see De Lillo and Lesk (2010). For traveling time analyses in virtual reality tasks on related topics see Logie et al (2011) and Trawley et al (2011). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%