2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2015.7353660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-based signaling for reducing required data rates and processing power in a large-scale artificial robotic skin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This results in lower demands on communication bandwidth and processing power for the same amount of skin cells. In our previous paper [9] we demonstrated through simulations with off-line event generators and real sensor data that event-based signaling indeed reduces the requirements on the communication bandwidth. This work now focuses on the realization of the previously proposed event-based signaling principle in our robot skin architecture.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This results in lower demands on communication bandwidth and processing power for the same amount of skin cells. In our previous paper [9] we demonstrated through simulations with off-line event generators and real sensor data that event-based signaling indeed reduces the requirements on the communication bandwidth. This work now focuses on the realization of the previously proposed event-based signaling principle in our robot skin architecture.…”
Section: A Motivationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our previous work [9] we explained how we can use of this principle in the context of robot skins. We demonstrated by off-line simulation with real sensor data how the proposed event generator will behave and how it will reduce network bandwidth demands.…”
Section: B Event Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For each control update it is necessary to browse active cells in each patch and to sum-up their corresponding force contributions as exposed in the algorithms 1 and 2. While the amount of generated data is substantial, it is nevertheless handled very efficiently [20], thereby guaranteeing extremely low latency. TOMM's central unit is based on two intel i7 computers with 16 Gb of RAM each: the first unit is dedicated to control tasks while the second one is used for machine learning and vision.…”
Section: A Implementation Details and Hardwarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With 300 skin cells this processing load impacts the performance of real time control and this is more evident when the number of skin cells increases. In order to cope with this problem we use eventbased signaling [23]. We take advantage of the distributed micro-controllers of the skin cells and generate events on site.…”
Section: A Event-based Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%