2011
DOI: 10.5121/ijdms.2011.3311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event Centric Modeling Approach in Colocation Pattern Analysis From Spatial Data

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies on spatial colocation patterns mainly focus on three aspects, namely, method improvement, spatial colocation rule innovation, and data type expansion. Among these aspects, the most typical methods include feature‐centric (Yoo, Shekhar, and Celik 2005), window‐centric (Venkatesan and Thangavelu 2013), and event‐centric (Wang et al 2008; Venkatesan, Thangavelu, and Prabhavathy 2011) models. A series of distance‐focused methods, including optimization algorithm with focus on pruning strategy (Al‐Naymat 2008; Wang et al 2009) and K‐nearest neighbor (Qian et al 2013), traffic network (Kudic 2015; Yu 2017), and dynamic neighborhood (Qian, He, and He 2009) constraints, have been proposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies on spatial colocation patterns mainly focus on three aspects, namely, method improvement, spatial colocation rule innovation, and data type expansion. Among these aspects, the most typical methods include feature‐centric (Yoo, Shekhar, and Celik 2005), window‐centric (Venkatesan and Thangavelu 2013), and event‐centric (Wang et al 2008; Venkatesan, Thangavelu, and Prabhavathy 2011) models. A series of distance‐focused methods, including optimization algorithm with focus on pruning strategy (Al‐Naymat 2008; Wang et al 2009) and K‐nearest neighbor (Qian et al 2013), traffic network (Kudic 2015; Yu 2017), and dynamic neighborhood (Qian, He, and He 2009) constraints, have been proposed.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results, it is ensure that this proposed technique outperformed of about more than 50% of previous algorithm in time and memory usage. Venkatesan et al (2011) have mainly focused on spatial co-location patterns. That is the subsets of Boolean spatial features whose instances are often located in close geographic proximity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial co-location pattern is the subsets of Boolean spatial features whose instances are often located in close geographic proximity (Venkatesan et al, 2011). It is a set of spatial features that are frequently located together in spatial proximity (Venkatesan et al, 2011). Extracting interesting and useful patterns from spatial datasets is more difficult than extracting untrivial patterns from traditional numeric and categorical data due to the complexity of spatial data types, spatial relationships and spatial autocorrelation (Wan et al, 2008;Altidor et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation