2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-35063-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-Driven Ontology Updating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to prevent invalid or otherwise incorrectly recognized events from corrupting the ontology, the event updates are propagated to the knowledge base when the user explicitly marks them as valid. This change of the ontology is performed by rule actions [35], which are associated to event rules. If an event rule triggers and is considered to be valid, the event actions are executed.…”
Section: Knowledge Base Updating: News Items May Contain Knowledge Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to prevent invalid or otherwise incorrectly recognized events from corrupting the ontology, the event updates are propagated to the knowledge base when the user explicitly marks them as valid. This change of the ontology is performed by rule actions [35], which are associated to event rules. If an event rule triggers and is considered to be valid, the event actions are executed.…”
Section: Knowledge Base Updating: News Items May Contain Knowledge Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J Sangers, F Hogenboom and F Frasincar propose an event-driven automated ontology updating approach. They propose different execution models, providing flexibility with respect to the update process [10]. A Hamilton, EJ Gonzá lez, L Acosta, Arnay and J Espelosí n present a semantic approach for route determination and support for several vehicles sharing the same environment.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, much work has been done to study factors that influence the implementation and performance of the BPR [3]. The Hammer and Champy's BPR methodology (Business system diamond), Davenport's and Short's Methodology, process analysis and design methods (PADM) framework, and Jacobson's methodology (objective-oriented methodology of BPR) explain the core process and objective of BPR [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Hammer and Champy describe the reengineering objective as "achieving dramatic improvements by redesigning the fundamental business process" [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these four methods, other proposed methodologies do not address the change in the core process of BPR. Most of them consider factors that influence BPR in terms of the management perspective that can instigate risks [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. In terms of organizational culture, process reengineering represents tools and technique for management by bringing significant changes in the operations procedures [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation