Event history analysis on racial disparities in the path to adoption for Black and White children

Cho, Minhae; Harlin, Eric; Ihm, Jungjoon; Lee, Chi Hyun

doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2023.106231

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As a unifying framework, the concept of reproductive justice therefore went beyond the pro-choice activist focus on the legal right to abortion and access to contraception and addressed some of the critiques of the mainstream feminist movement's lack of attention to the concerns of poor women and women of color. (Liddell, 2019, p. 100) Adoption scholars have also begun to engage the notion of reproductive justice in adoption (e.g., McKee, 2018), drawing attention to the deep racial and class disparities that mark adoption practices (Cho et al, 2023).…”

Section: Background: Reproductive Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Social Work in a Post-Dobbs World: The ‘Adoption Fallacy’, Decolonization, and Reproductive Justice

Cheney,

Rotabi

2023

Affilia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article takes as its departure a critique of the ‘adoption fallacy’ underlying the US Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization to argue that the Dobbs decision incentivizes a reconsideration of social work practice as a site for advancing reproductive justice. To do this, however, social work must strive to decolonize the profession by critically reflecting on its role in reproductive policy and politics, particularly its complicity in abortion and adoption decisions that may have limited—and continue to limit—reproductive justice. Only then can social work effectively counter the adoption fallacy and advocate more broadly for reproductive justice.

show abstract

Section: Background: Reproductive Justicementioning

confidence: 99%