2016
DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2016.1233737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Event, politics, and space: Rancière or Badiou’?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through re‐remembering the post‐war squatting movements, we therefore rediscover a politics of effraction or “forced entry” which “carries something of the violence of a revolutionary tradition … in refiguring the division of the sensory to allow the speech of [the poor] to be heard” (Davis :99). Put differently, a politics of forced entry is that which allows an “irruption of the so‐far invisible, unheard, part of no part” (Bassett :287) or a politics which can “make non‐sense appear” (Burgum ) and, by rediscovering this tradition, we might well open up the possibility for similar actions in the present.…”
Section: The Poor: Voice Appearance and The Politics Of Forced Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through re‐remembering the post‐war squatting movements, we therefore rediscover a politics of effraction or “forced entry” which “carries something of the violence of a revolutionary tradition … in refiguring the division of the sensory to allow the speech of [the poor] to be heard” (Davis :99). Put differently, a politics of forced entry is that which allows an “irruption of the so‐far invisible, unheard, part of no part” (Bassett :287) or a politics which can “make non‐sense appear” (Burgum ) and, by rediscovering this tradition, we might well open up the possibility for similar actions in the present.…”
Section: The Poor: Voice Appearance and The Politics Of Forced Entrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference with Badiou’s event thus hinges on the notion of organisation. As noted by Bassett (2016), both Rancière and Badiou ‘ agree that real politics must also be a mode of radical subjectivization, but Badiou’s criticism is that Rancière fails to see that any such subjectivization must also be an organized and disciplined process ’ (p. 282). Badiou’s focus on organised action – be it in the case of the mass rebel or the state revolutionary – provides a different way out of the ‘post-political condition’ in planning.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Planner As State Revolutionarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Logics of Worlds (originally published in 2006; translated into English in 2009), Badiou posits that events can be brought about by two ‘evental’ figures, one working against the state (the mass rebel) and the other working from within the state (the state revolutionary). While the figure of the state revolutionary has been neglected by Badiou’s proponents (Bassett, 2016; Swyngedouw, 2011) and critics alike (Hannah, 2016), it has a lot to offer to those working on the politics of planning.…”
Section: Introduction: Post-politics and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both Jacques Rancière and Alain Badiou are customarily associated with the philosophy of the event (or interruption) (Bassett 2016). While that is undoubtedly correct, the status of “the event” is rarely critically examined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%