2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-related EEG oscillations to semantically unrelated words in normal and learning disabled children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest between-group difference was found for the theta band. Thus, this finding corresponds to several previously published studies showing an increase in theta band power in children with LD [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, unlike in several previous studies, we did not observe a decrease in alpha band power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strongest between-group difference was found for the theta band. Thus, this finding corresponds to several previously published studies showing an increase in theta band power in children with LD [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, unlike in several previous studies, we did not observe a decrease in alpha band power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…EEG studies that examined children with LD have shown that they have greater theta and less alpha (and beta) power than what is normal for their age during a relaxed state. These findings are often considered evidence for the so-called 'maturational delay hypothesis' [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. This knowledge has been used to guide a specific neurofeedback therapy that supports the improvement of LD disabilities [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairs of words that were semantically related or unrelated were presented to both LD children and control children with good scholastic achievement. During this presentation, the event-related EEG responses were recorded (Fernández et al, 2012). This task was selected because it requires several language processes and other associated processes, such as attention and working memory.…”
Section: Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receptive vocabulary was evaluated using the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-4 (PPVT; Dunn & Dunn, 2007). Expressive vocabulary and non-verbal reasoning abilities were measured using the vocabulary and matrix reasoning subtests of the Weschler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI-II; Wechsler, 2002); WASI scores were not collected for three participants.…”
Section: Psychometric Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%