Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder

Wise, Vikki; McFarlane, Alexander C.; Clark, Christopher; Battersby, Malcolm

doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.07.001

Cited by 26 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 100 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The resting EEG tasks are the first two tasks in the psychophysiological test battery. Notably, we have previously reported findings from a later test within the same psychophysiological test battery (Wise et al, 2009). At the time of undertaking the EEG tasks participants had been in the laboratory for approximately 1 h.…”

Section: Stimulus Materials and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 85%

An integrative assessment of brain and body function ‘at rest’ in panic disorder: A combined quantitative EEG/autonomic function study

Wise

McFarlane

Clark

et al. 2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Stimulus Materials and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 85%

An integrative assessment of brain and body function ‘at rest’ in panic disorder: A combined quantitative EEG/autonomic function study

Wise

McFarlane

Clark

et al. 2011

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This fact, suggests that in the last decades N1 and N2 components have been studied as possible endophenotypes or bio-markers for different disorders and in some cases for recovery index: namely, in schizophrenia (Hegerl et al 1988;Haig et al 1997;Potts et al 1998a;Shelley et al 1999;Ford et al 2001;Brown et al 2002;Gilmore et al 2005;Neuhaus et al 2013), dementia (Verma et al 1989), Alzheimer (Sumi et al 2000), epilepsy and AED effects (Akaho 1996;Ford et al 2001;Lucchesi et al 2003), alcohol (Brigham et al 1997;Cohen et al 2002) and substance abuse (Tarter et al 1995;Brigham et al 1997), psychosis (Valkonen-Korhonen et al 2003), panic disorder (Wise et al 2009), Parkinson's disease (Wright et al (1996), ADHD (Johnstone et al 2001;Tsai et al 2012), stroke (Hirata et al 1996) and vascular cognitive impairment (van Harten et al 2006), myotonic dystrophy (Kazis et al 1996;Tanaka et al 2012), head injury (Reinvang et al 2000;Segalowitz et al 2001), (Guney et al 2009), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (Ogawa et al 2009) and multiple sclerosis (Whelan et al 2010), more recently fragile X syndrome treatment (Schneider et al 2013), and bipolar disorder (Hamm et al 2013). …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Auditory event-related potentials (AERPs) are widely used in diverse fields of today's neuroscience, concerning auditory processing, speech perception, language acquisition, neurodevelopment, attention and cognition in normal aging, gender, developmental, neurologic and psychiatric disorders. However, its transposition to clinical practice has remained minimal. Mainly due to scarce literature on normative data across age, wide spectrum of results, variety of auditory stimuli used and to different neuropsychological meanings of AERPs components between authors. One of the most prominent AERP components studied in last decades was N1, which reflects auditory detection and discrimination. Subsequently, N2 indicates attention allocation and phonological analysis. The simultaneous analysis of N1 and N2 elicited by feasible novelty experimental paradigms, such as auditory oddball, seems an objective method to assess central auditory processing. The aim of this systematic review was to bring forward normative values for auditory oddball N1 and N2 components across age. EBSCO, PubMed, Web of Knowledge and Google Scholar were systematically searched for studies that elicited N1 and/or N2 by auditory oddball paradigm. A total of 2,764 papers were initially identified in the database, of which 19 resulted from hand search and additional references, between 1988 and 2013, last 25 years. A final total of 68 studies met the eligibility criteria with a total of 2,406 participants from control groups for N1 (age range 6.6-85 years; mean 34.42) and 1,507 for N2 (age range 9-85 years; mean 36.13). Polynomial regression analysis revealed that N1 latency decreases with aging at Fz and Cz, N1 amplitude at Cz decreases from childhood to adolescence and stabilizes after 30-40 years and at Fz the decrement finishes by 60 years and highly increases after this age. Regarding N2, latency did not covary with age but amplitude showed a significant decrement for both Cz and Fz. Results suggested reliable normative values for Cz and Fz electrode locations; however, changes in brain development and components topography over age should be considered in clinical practice.

show abstract

“…This amplitude is observed in early attentive information processes and declines when stimuli are repeatedly displayed [18, 19]. There is evidence for increased N1 in PD [20-23], though some studies did report equal N1 amplitudes between PD patients and healthy controls (HC) [24, 25]. Further abnormalities in information processing in PD have been reported for increased P3a amplitudes to rare stimuli in a common two-tone oddball task, most likely indicating irregularities in passive attention processes [24].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reduced Sensitivity to Non-Fear-Related Stimulus Changes in Panic Disorder

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Panic disorder (PD) is associated with increased body vigilance and reduced cognitive resources directed at non-fear-related stimuli, particularly in the absence of stimulus-rich environments. To date, only few studies have investigated whether this deficit in PD is reflected in reduced mismatch negativity (MMN), an event-related potential indexing preattentive sensitivity to unexpected stimulus changes. We tested 35 patients affected by PD and 42 matched healthy controls in an oddball paradigm, using frequency and duration deviant stimuli to measure auditory MMN. PD patients displayed reduced duration MMN amplitudes in comparison to healthy controls. No group differences were detected for duration MMN latency, as well as frequency MMN indices. Results support the notion of reduced processing of non-fear-related stimuli in PD patients, particularly with regard to the preattentive processing of sound duration deviants. Additionally, our findings are in line with clinical studies reporting divergent deficits in preattentive processing of frequency and duration deviants.

show abstract

Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder

Cited by 26 publications

References 100 publications

An integrative assessment of brain and body function ‘at rest’ in panic disorder: A combined quantitative EEG/autonomic function study

An integrative assessment of brain and body function ‘at rest’ in panic disorder: A combined quantitative EEG/autonomic function study

The development of the N1 and N2 components in auditory oddball paradigms: a systematic review with narrative analysis and suggested normative values

Reduced Sensitivity to Non-Fear-Related Stimulus Changes in Panic Disorder

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About