2010
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhq072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event Study Testing with Cross-sectional Correlation of Abnormal Returns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
401
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 499 publications
(408 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
7
401
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, using the traditional standardized return test statistics, even moderate cross-sectional correlation in an event study causes substantial over-rejection of the null hypothesis of no abnormal performance. Kolari and Pynnönen (2010) propose simple corrections to the popular Patell (1976) and Boehmer, Musumeci, and Poulsen (1991) statistics to account for the correlation. They show that, when there is no event-induced volatility increase, each of these corrected test statistics is approximately equally powerful and rejects the null hypothesis of no abnormal performance at the correct nominal rate when it is true.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, using the traditional standardized return test statistics, even moderate cross-sectional correlation in an event study causes substantial over-rejection of the null hypothesis of no abnormal performance. Kolari and Pynnönen (2010) propose simple corrections to the popular Patell (1976) and Boehmer, Musumeci, and Poulsen (1991) statistics to account for the correlation. They show that, when there is no event-induced volatility increase, each of these corrected test statistics is approximately equally powerful and rejects the null hypothesis of no abnormal performance at the correct nominal rate when it is true.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Warner (1980, 1985) test the event study methodology empirically for the effect of events on the variance of stock returns conducting sampling and simulations. Finally, Kolari and Pynnonen (2010) suggest a modification to the event study analysis to account for co-movements of the prices of stock from the same industry that reacts in the same way to the same event. In our work, we apply this proposed methodology of Kolari and Pynnonen. As mentioned, the event study methodology consists of measuring the effect of a certain event on the return of one or more stocks.…”
Section: Event Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar stocks tend to co-move in this case because of intra-sectional correlations. 13 To avoid the effects of intra-industry correlations, we implement the procedure suggested by Kolari and Pynnonen (2010), which we describe in detail in the next section.…”
Section: Event Study Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sign and rank test for event studies proposed by Corrado (1989) is used to supplement the parametric t-tests. The sign and rank test is regarded as more robust when there are deviations from normality, data outliers and date-variance increases (Donnelly, 2008;Kolari & Pynnönen, 2010;Corrado, 2011) 5 and is important for confirming the initial results from the ttests. Nevertheless, it must be stressed that event methodology does not prove a causal relationship between an event and changes in share prices.…”
Section: Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%