2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event-triggered controller design of nonlinear discrete-time networked control systems in T-S fuzzy model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, an event-triggered PCS based control system is designed for the purpose of reducing transmissions without considering the network induced time delays. The study is based on the structure of Fig.1, which includes a plant, a sensor system, and a controller system, and only communication savings in sensor-controller channel are desirable [25][26][27]. As we know, the regular network control systems usually include a plant, a sensor system, a controller system, and an actuator system, and both the sensorcontroller and controller-actuator channel should be considered.…”
Section: Event-triggered Pcs Based Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, an event-triggered PCS based control system is designed for the purpose of reducing transmissions without considering the network induced time delays. The study is based on the structure of Fig.1, which includes a plant, a sensor system, and a controller system, and only communication savings in sensor-controller channel are desirable [25][26][27]. As we know, the regular network control systems usually include a plant, a sensor system, a controller system, and an actuator system, and both the sensorcontroller and controller-actuator channel should be considered.…”
Section: Event-triggered Pcs Based Control Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [33,34], the authors set the event-triggered threshold to be the sum of a proportional threshold times the quadratic form of the transmitted signals and an additional constant. In [35], the condition of the event-triggered threshold was set the same as in [33,34], but the constant was replaced by an exponential decay function. Recently, Li et al [36] proposed the ETM which consists of a state-dependent term, an exponentially decreasing term and a constant term, and studied a novel decentralised event-triggered dynamic-output-feedback L∞ control for NCSs, but didn't present a specific algorithm to find the ETM parameters to render the network load and control performance to reach an expected level.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sophisticated modelling methods based on hybrid frameworks [40,41], advanced neural computing models [42][43][44][45][46] and genetic programming frameworks [47][48][49] are required to quantify the multi-physics mechanisms for an improved battery design. There could be another factor such as the sudden mechanical impact (buckling, shearing and compression tests) which can also influence the battery capacity estimation.…”
Section: Interactions Among Multi-physics In Battery Packmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interactions between these mechanisms are hardly studied as it is complicated. Sophisticated modelling methods based on hybrid frameworks [40,41], advanced neural computing models [42][43][44][45][46] and genetic programming frameworks [47][48][49] are required to quantify the multi-physics mechanisms for an improved battery design. .00000000000000e-001, 0.00000000000000e+000, 3.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 1.00000000000000e+000, 4.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 3.00000000000000e-001, 4.00000000000000e-001, 2.00000000000000e-001, 0.00000000000000e+000, 3.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 2.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 4.00000000000000e-001, 8.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 8.00000000000000e-001, 3.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 3.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 4.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 2.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 4.00000000000000e-001, 8.00000000000000e-001, 2.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 4.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 4.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e+000, 2.00000000000000e-001, 8.00000000000000e-001, 0.00000000000000e+000, 1.00000000000000e+000, 4.00000000000000e-001, 4.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 6.00000000000000e-001, 3.00000000000000e-001, 8.00000000000000e-001, 3.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e-001, 5.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002, 1.00000000000000e-001, 3.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e-001, 1.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002, 9.99999999999999e-002, 1.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002, 1.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002, 1.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002, 1.00000000000000e-001, 9.99999999999999e-002,…”
Section: Interactions Among Multi-physics In Battery Packmentioning
confidence: 99%