2020
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cps.2019.0067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Event‐triggered detection of cyberattacks on load frequency control

Abstract: Modern power systems are extensively interlaced with data communication at various levels leading to increased vulnerability to cyberattacks at individual components as well as integrated controls. An effective cyber protection is, therefore, fast becoming an indispensable requirement for the smart grids. A false data injection (FDI) attack on load frequency control (LFC) is a stealth process, which has devastating consequences while at times may also lead to catastrophic system blackouts. This work comprises … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other well-established model-based approaches in the literature include the parametric feedback linearization using a static estimation process [13], graphicalbased methods [14], chi-square detector [15], matrix separation approach [16], nonlinear observer-based methods [17], and non-stationary signal processing approach of Hilbert-Huang transform [18]. Despite the advantages of mentioned approaches for CPAs detection, e.g., real-time detection and low computational burden, they are often designed for a single time slot, i.e., operation point, not a wide range of system operation [19], [20]. Moreover, the mentioned approaches neglect the uncertainties in the operation of IMG, e.g., varying parameters, topology change owing to load disturbances, intermittent nature of RESs, and operation in islanded and grid-connected modes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other well-established model-based approaches in the literature include the parametric feedback linearization using a static estimation process [13], graphicalbased methods [14], chi-square detector [15], matrix separation approach [16], nonlinear observer-based methods [17], and non-stationary signal processing approach of Hilbert-Huang transform [18]. Despite the advantages of mentioned approaches for CPAs detection, e.g., real-time detection and low computational burden, they are often designed for a single time slot, i.e., operation point, not a wide range of system operation [19], [20]. Moreover, the mentioned approaches neglect the uncertainties in the operation of IMG, e.g., varying parameters, topology change owing to load disturbances, intermittent nature of RESs, and operation in islanded and grid-connected modes [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COMPARISON WITH THE LITERATURE [6], [27] [29], [30] [8], [12], [19], [20] [31], [32] Our Proposed Method measurement channels of LFC systems. In [24], a new virtual inertia control strategy in IMGs is introduced to alleviate the impact of the attack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%