Events als Kommunikationsinstrument im Hochschulmarketing

Schneider, André

doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-6885-2_4

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

The German Push In Science Communication1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2014

2020

Publication Types

Select...

Book5

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…They also organise local activities on their own or in cooperation with others such as 'long nights' of science, open days, 'science slams', citizen science, children's universities and school labs at research institutions (Weingart et al, 2007;Schneider, 2012;Fähnrich, 2017). Yet there are some concerns that the engagement activities implemented after the PUSH memorandum lack concrete aims and target groups; are largely manifestations of one-way knowledge dissemination by scientists; only preach to the converted; and avoid direct dialogue between scientists and citizens about controversial issues (Schnabel, 2008).…”

Section: The German Push In Science Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Communicating Science: A Global Perspective

Gascoigne¹,

Schiele²,

Leach³

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Network for the Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST), which allowed us to test concepts, recruit authors and launch the book to the international community of science communication researchers and practitioners.The 108 authors who wrote the 40 chapters. They were willing, responsive and cheerful in drafting, revising and re-drafting their chapters.Bernard Schiele for his exhaustive work in compiling and analysing the data from the timelines.

show abstract

Section: The German Push In Science Communicationmentioning

confidence: 99%