1996
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter.

Abstract: The effect of life events on subjective well-being (SWB) was explored in a 2-year longitudinal study of 115 participants. It was found that only life events during the previous 3 months influenced life satisfaction and positive and negative affect. Although recent life events influenced SWB even when personality at Time 1 was controlled, distal life events did not correlate with SWB. SWB and life events both showed a substantial degree of temporal stability. It was also found that good and bad life events tend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

44
405
5
34

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 617 publications
(488 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
44
405
5
34
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical and current studies support this rationale and show that through the effect of time, people adapt to the impact of major Life Events and Socio-Demographic changes (Bonanno, Moskowitz, Papa, & Folkman, 2005;Lowenstein & Frederick, 1999;Silver & Wortman, 1980). Suh, Diener and Fujita (1996) concluded that life events and personality differ in the duration of their effects on SWB. Life events produce a short-term effect (three to six months on average) and personality produces a long-term effect (at least two years) in the variability of SWB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classical and current studies support this rationale and show that through the effect of time, people adapt to the impact of major Life Events and Socio-Demographic changes (Bonanno, Moskowitz, Papa, & Folkman, 2005;Lowenstein & Frederick, 1999;Silver & Wortman, 1980). Suh, Diener and Fujita (1996) concluded that life events and personality differ in the duration of their effects on SWB. Life events produce a short-term effect (three to six months on average) and personality produces a long-term effect (at least two years) in the variability of SWB.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Some studies have shown differences in the impact of the predictors of SWB in a present context, as well as within a six-month interval. Some studies indicate that contextual factors may be better predictors of SWB in the present, while intrapersonal trait factors may be important predictors of mediumand long-term SWB (Suh, Diener & Fujita, 1996). Could these differences be observed in shorter temporal intervals?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For decades, studies of life satisfaction examined the dynamic confluence of various factors, ranging from mood (e.g., Schwarz & Clore, 1983) to life events (e.g., Suh, Diener, & Fujita, 1996) and long-term personality (Diener & Lucas, in press). The present study suggests that culture may also exert a significant influence on the construct of life satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, we sought to replicate these Phenomenal characteristics 7 findings, and we also examined the possibility that the temporal distance of the events could modulate the influence of valence on the time needed to construct memories of past experiences. Distant past events typically have fewer implications than recent past events for current well-being (Suh, Diener, & Fujita, 1996), so people may view negative aspects of their remote past more dispassionately. Furthermore, there is evidence indicating that people tend to flatter recent and deprecate distant former selves in order to enhance their current selfregard (Wilson & Ross, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%