2008
DOI: 10.1080/14649360701856110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everyday tactics and spaces of power: the role of informal economies in post-Soviet Ukraine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, similar to government welfare spending, nonprofit sector employment data for the early transition period is unreliable within many FSU countries. Further, much of the nonprofit sector employment that did exist in Ukraine or Russia was taking place in the informal economy (Round, Williams, & Rodgers, 2008). Thus measuring nonprofit sector size as a % of employment might not be reflective of actual size.…”
Section: Social Origins Theory (Sot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, similar to government welfare spending, nonprofit sector employment data for the early transition period is unreliable within many FSU countries. Further, much of the nonprofit sector employment that did exist in Ukraine or Russia was taking place in the informal economy (Round, Williams, & Rodgers, 2008). Thus measuring nonprofit sector size as a % of employment might not be reflective of actual size.…”
Section: Social Origins Theory (Sot)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently however, this 'exit' perspective has also been argued by a wider collection of both public choice scholars (for a review, see Gërxhani, 2004b) as well as critical, post-colonial, poststructuralist, post-development and post-capitalist scholars seeking to transcend the conventional 'thin' depiction of monetary exchange as universally market-like and profitdriven by adopting 'thicker' portrayals that unpack the messy logics of monetized transactions (Escobar 1995;Zelizer 2005). For example, this has been argued by those drawing attention to how informal work is often conducted for and by kin, neighbours, friends and acquaintances and for reasons other than purely financial gain (Persson and Malmer, 2006;Round and Williams, 2008;Williams, 2004;Round, 2008, 2010).…”
Section: Participation In the Informal Economy And Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is a representation of participants in informal markets as social actors rather than rational economic actors (Nelson and Smith, 1999;Round and Williams, 2008;Williams, 2004). This view recognizes that informal work is often conducted for and by kin, neighbors, friends and acquaintances for social or redistributive rationales, such as to give an unemployed person money in a manner that avoids any connotation that charity is involved, which might prevent the recipient from accepting the money (Kempson, 1996).…”
Section: Social/redistributive Rationales Explanationmentioning
confidence: 99%