1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0047-2727(97)00048-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Everyone may benefit from subsidising entry to risky occupations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation is interesting in view of past discussion (Kanbur 1981;Black and de Meza 1997) on the e¢ ciency of risk-taking in competitive economies.…”
Section: Risk-taking and Income Distributionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This observation is interesting in view of past discussion (Kanbur 1981;Black and de Meza 1997) on the e¢ ciency of risk-taking in competitive economies.…”
Section: Risk-taking and Income Distributionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Those who are least risk averse will choose to enter the riskiest occupations. Kanbur (1979) and Black and de Meza (1997) assume employment is safe but self-employment is risky, and address the social e¢ ciency of aggregate risk-taking. Self-employment attracts the least risk-averse taxpayers, who will evade the most when the opportunity arises.…”
Section: Occupational Choicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that each contract is on the bank's break-even line, under the further assumption that U P (C P ) > U P (C P OOL ) 5 with the pooling contract , C P OOL , at zero collateral c = 0, thus, no other contract (hypothetically labeled C N ) can attract any bundle of the two entrepreneurs and make a positive expected pro…t. Note that this requires a zero collateral contract just for rich borrowers.…”
Section: Perverse Cross-subsidizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of cross-subsidization has been one of the most intensely discussed topics in the area, both in theory and practice (e.g., Black and de Meza, 1997;de Meza andWebb, 1999, 2000;de Meza, 2002), although more rarely it has been addressed from the equity point of view. Our contribution is grounded in the literature on ine¢ ciencies in the credit market by de 1 http://www.fsb.org.uk/News.aspx?loc=pressroom&rec=5742 Meza and Webb (1987), who point out the possibility that adverse selection in credit markets may lead to excessive entry into entrepreneurship due to cross subsidization, quite in contrast with the credit rationing phenomenon emphasized by Stiglitz and Weiss (1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%