2019
DOI: 10.1080/09505431.2019.1586866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Everywhere Surveillance’: Global Surveillance Regimes as Techno-Securitization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State-corporate surveillance certainly raises severe concerns about the invasion of privacy (Cayford & Pieters, 2018). Surveillance may have become a normalized key condition of living in a modern "techno-securitized society", as a way to ensure collective security (Bennett, 2011;Bernal, 2016;Clark, 2016;Petit, 2020). Yet at the same time, individuals' privacy concerns due to the introduction of ever more privacy-intrusive technologies are not unwarranted.…”
Section: George Orwell 1984mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…State-corporate surveillance certainly raises severe concerns about the invasion of privacy (Cayford & Pieters, 2018). Surveillance may have become a normalized key condition of living in a modern "techno-securitized society", as a way to ensure collective security (Bennett, 2011;Bernal, 2016;Clark, 2016;Petit, 2020). Yet at the same time, individuals' privacy concerns due to the introduction of ever more privacy-intrusive technologies are not unwarranted.…”
Section: George Orwell 1984mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, a nation-state's intelligence activities include "strategic intelligence" aimed at foreign governments to comprehend possible threats, as well as "tactical operations" targeted at specific individuals or groups of interest (Cayford & Pieters, 2018). However, recent state-led efforts to secure its citizens against global threats such as terrorism and espionage have turned almost anyone into a potential threat, and therefore likewise into a possible target of surveillance technologies (Petit, 2020). This has affected civil rights and basic freedoms (Milanovic, 2015), as exemplified by U.S. border agents "rightfully" searching travelers' smart phones, and requests by intelligence agencies for technology firms to install backdoors to encrypted services for the sake of national security.…”
Section: Concerns About Digital Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%