2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019077117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence accumulation for value computation in the prefrontal cortex during decision making

Abstract: A key step of decision making is to determine the value associated with each option. The evaluation process often depends on the accumulation of evidence from multiple sources, which may arrive at different times. How evidence is accumulated for value computation in the brain during decision making has not been well studied. To address this problem, we trained rhesus monkeys to perform a decision-making task in which they had to make eye movement choices between two targets, whose reward probabilities had to b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once learned, the mapping between these cues and reward attributes is fixed, and the subject must choose between options with explicitly cued values. Neurons in the central-lateral primate OFC and rat lOFC have been shown to represent the values associated with these sensory cues in their firing rates (although in rats these representations tend to occur after the choice, if the task requires one), as well as reward outcomes and outcome values [7, 29, 33, 34, 40, 4854]. However, the extent to which OFC is causally required for these tasks is a point of contention, and may differ across species [36, 55, 56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Once learned, the mapping between these cues and reward attributes is fixed, and the subject must choose between options with explicitly cued values. Neurons in the central-lateral primate OFC and rat lOFC have been shown to represent the values associated with these sensory cues in their firing rates (although in rats these representations tend to occur after the choice, if the task requires one), as well as reward outcomes and outcome values [7, 29, 33, 34, 40, 4854]. However, the extent to which OFC is causally required for these tasks is a point of contention, and may differ across species [36, 55, 56].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recordings from rat lOFC in sensory preconditioning paradigms have revealed cue-evoked responses that may reflect inferred value [29,37]. Studies in non-human primates have also reported strong encoding of offer values in OFC after presentation of a stimulus, and before choice [26,[38][39][40]. A recent study in mouse OFC used olfactory cues to convey reward attributes (juice identity and volume) and reported encoding of offer values before choice [41].…”
Section: Rat Lofc Weakly Encodes Reward Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this in mind, and given the evidence of reinforcement learning-compatible signaling in the brain [56,57], we advance the hypothesis that the similarities between the model workings and the experimental results originate from a common high-level 'optimal' strategy for dealing with a volatile environment, discovered through the interaction with the rules of the task. matches qualitatively the optimal strategy for fixed-duration tasks [8,10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With this in mind, and given the evidence of reinforcement learning-compatible signaling in the brain [56, 57], we advance the hypothesis that the similarities between the model workings and the experimental results originate from a common high-level ‘optimal’ strategy for dealing with a volatile environment, discovered through the interaction with the rules of the task. Though the implementation substrates are very different and present very different degrees of complexity, this shared strategy can help shed light on general information-processing principles leveraged by the brain itself.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Our results imply that the OFC does not integrate information from multiple simultaneously presented stimuli, as we showed that the less salient stimuli are ignored by the OFC. Although the representation of the salient value may be interpreted as a decision signal in the OFC, it has been demonstrated that the OFC neurons do not accumulate information from sequentially presented stimuli in a value-based decisionmaking task (Lin et al, 2020). The lack of information integration across space or time suggests that the OFC's role in value processing is more analogous to that of the early visual cortices in visual processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%