Evidence-Based Care for Couples With Infertility

Stevenson, Eleanor L.; Hershberger, Patricia E.; Bergh, Paul A.

doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.006

Cited by 23 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 55 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Treatment options for infertility, which depend on resource availability, include drugs to induce ovulation, intrauterine insemination, surgery to address abnormalities (such as blocked fallopian tubes) and assisted reproductive technologies. 199 Specific populations, including LGBTQ people and people living with medical conditions such as HIV or cancer, may especially need these types of care.…”

Section: Infertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2019

Sully¹,

Biddlecom²,

Darroch³

et al. 2020

250

229

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Infertilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Adding It Up: Investing in Sexual and Reproductive Health 2019

Sully¹,

Biddlecom²,

Darroch³

et al. 2020

250

229

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This inference may be based on some international research on the role of nurses in AHR, such as a study carried out in the United States (2018) on a new strategy that is being used by nurses in this field, which is Telenursing, used to communicate with patients on fertility and reproduction. The results reaffirm that these professionals who work with reproductive biotechnologies need to be differentiated, as they are required constant proximity to the couples who experience AHR, having the responsibility to care for, monitor and respond to the health demands and needs of these couples (28)(29) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 70%

Social representation of reproductive biotechnologies among nurses working in sexual and reproductive health

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: to compare the social representations of reproductive biotechnologies among sexual and reproductive health nurses, and their links with professional practice. Methods: an analytical, comparative, qualitative research, supported by the Theory of Social Representation, carried out in May/2014-February/2015, with 32 nurses from the city of Rio de Janeiro. Semi-structured interview, analyzed by ALCESTE® software. Results: nurses not active in assisted human reproduction represent reproductive biotechnologies as unnatural methods of human reproduction, assessing the practice in this field as generalist and bureaucratic. Those who work represent as auxiliary and supporting nature for heterosexual couples, considering the innovative and specialized practice. Final considerations: each group presented specific contents and dimensions about reproductive biotechnologies. The representations are centered on moral, normative and ideological personal values, anchored in the traditional conceptions of human and family reproduction, but also collective, acquired in the professional routine, showing group identity and its distinct practices considering reproductive biotechnologies.

show abstract

“…If they continue under the care of their primary women’s care provider, they will experience even more cycles before ultimately seeking evaluation from the RE. A comprehensive evaluation (17) that ultimately does not find an underlying cause of the infertility may contribute to the feeling of unpredictability. For those who ultimately achieve a pregnancy via IVF, they acknowledge that their pregnancy was very difficult to achieve and if something were to negatively occur, there is uncertainty they would be able to achieve another (8).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%