Evidence Based Medicine - Closer to Patients or Scientists? 2012
DOI: 10.5772/37717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-Based Cervical Cancer Screening: The Modern Evolution of the Pap Smear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(62 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is also seen in 880 samples studied by Ranabhat et al, 10 where 80% of all epithelial abnormality was seen in patients more than 40 years of age. Proportion of ASCUS (3.2%) is similar to the report given in Evidence Based Medicine (4%) 11 and Vaghela et al 12 (2.8%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This is also seen in 880 samples studied by Ranabhat et al, 10 where 80% of all epithelial abnormality was seen in patients more than 40 years of age. Proportion of ASCUS (3.2%) is similar to the report given in Evidence Based Medicine (4%) 11 and Vaghela et al 12 (2.8%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Despite promising results from HPV vaccination, glaring inequalities in vaccine access and failure of vaccines to protect against all cancer‐inducing HPV strains makes screening the best‐buy in the continuum of interventions against cervical cancer 15–17 . Three major CCS methods are the Papanicolaou smear test, HPV‐based testing, and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) 18–20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 , 16 , 17 Three major CCS methods are the Papanicolaou smear test, HPV‐based testing, and visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA). 18 , 19 , 20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%