2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline on antibiotic use for the urgent management of pulpal- and periapical-related dental pain and intraoral swelling

Abstract: Background. An expert panel convened by the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs and the Center for Evidence-Based Dentistry conducted a systematic review and formulated clinical recommendations for the urgent management of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis with or without symptomatic apical periodontitis, pulp necrosis and symptomatic apical periodontitis, or pulp necrosis and localized acute apical abscess using antibiotics, either alone or as adjuncts to definitive, conservative dental … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
115
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
7
115
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, this process alleviated the need for in‐office visits by recommending over‐the‐counter pain management regiments and in select cases antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotics were prescribed based on the antibiotic stewardship guidelines from the ADA 31 . Urgent but not emergent patients would only be scheduled on days that emergency patients as defined above were scheduled.…”
Section: Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, this process alleviated the need for in‐office visits by recommending over‐the‐counter pain management regiments and in select cases antibiotic prescriptions. Antibiotics were prescribed based on the antibiotic stewardship guidelines from the ADA 31 . Urgent but not emergent patients would only be scheduled on days that emergency patients as defined above were scheduled.…”
Section: Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted this review in collaboration with an expert panel during the development of an associated clinical practice guideline. 12 For Cochrane Reviews licensed under the standard Cochrane license for publication, the Cochrane Collaboration grants each user a nonexclusive, nontransferable, perpetual, royalty-free, worldwide license for noncommercial use of the data. Users may extract, download, and make copies of the information contained in the data and may share that information with third parties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its content informed the development of a clinical practice guideline on the appropriate use of antibiotics for the urgent management of pulpal-and periapical-related pain and intraoral swelling published in The Journal of the American Dental Association. 12…”
Section: Citationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 This systematic review was used to collect and synthesize evidence to inform the first comprehensive guideline on appropriate antibiotic prescribing for pulpal-and periapical-related dental pain and associated intraoral swelling for general dentists in the United States. 1 This information is important for dentists who prescribe antibiotics for these conditions, as well as for patients who seek care in settings in which DCDT, such as pulpectomy, pulpotomy, nonsurgical root canal therapy, and incision and drainage of abscess may not always be available (for example, hospital emergency departments). However, this information is also important for practitioners and patients in settings in which DCDT, with or without the additional use of antibiotics, can be delivered.…”
Section: Why Is This Systematic Review Important?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The guideline presents recommendations on the use of antibiotics for the urgent management of dental pain and intraoral swelling in adults who have the ability to fight a bacterial infection. 1 This systematic review and meta-analysis presents the evidence informing the effect (benefits and harms) of antibiotic use on this patient population and the certainty (quality) of this evidence. 2…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%