2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence-based decision-making: On the use of systematicity cases to check the compliance of reviews with reporting guidelines such as PRISMA 2020

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bibliographical assestment performed in this paper was performed by using PRISMA guidelines (Belle & Zhao, 2023). It requires indicating the strategies to find the works to be revised, the databases used, the conditions to be considered, and exploration procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliographical assestment performed in this paper was performed by using PRISMA guidelines (Belle & Zhao, 2023). It requires indicating the strategies to find the works to be revised, the databases used, the conditions to be considered, and exploration procedures.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliographic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines [24]. Its implementation required us to specify the methodology used to search for the documents to be reviewed, the databases where these documents should be found, the types of documents that will be considered, etc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bibliographic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines [22]. Its implementation requires specifying the methodology used to search for the documents to be reviewed, the databases where these documents should be found, the types of documents that will be considered, etc.…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, we only analysed works written in English. We chose to combine two databases, SCOPUS and WoS, in this review, as they are commonly used in bibliographic reviews, and it is recommended to combine more than one bibliographic source when the topic is not very broad [22].…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%