1996
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7034.819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evidence based general practice: a retrospective study of interventions in one training practice

Abstract: Most interventions within general practice are based on evidence from clinical trials, but the methods used in such trials may not be the most appropriate to apply to this setting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
91
1
8

Year Published

1996
1996
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(111 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
91
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Second, patient intuition may assume increased credibility when there are significant limitations to the expertise of clinicians as may occur in the absence of consistent scientific evidence. [32][33][34] Medical evidence, even when available, is typically incomplete and provisional; 35 indeed "for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true" (p.696). 36 Even when findings are internally valid, their translation to individualized patient care may be problematic.…”
Section: Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Second, patient intuition may assume increased credibility when there are significant limitations to the expertise of clinicians as may occur in the absence of consistent scientific evidence. [32][33][34] Medical evidence, even when available, is typically incomplete and provisional; 35 indeed "for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true" (p.696). 36 Even when findings are internally valid, their translation to individualized patient care may be problematic.…”
Section: Credibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1995) and the subsequent general practice equivalent (Gill et al 1996), stimulated a debate around the evidence base of other specialities and the appropriateness of the approach. In the latter study, the authors stress that their results cannot be generalized, but the interest of the study lies in the issues and questions it identifies, rather than solely in the figures it reveals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il résulte de cette convergence entre la frange la plus positiviste du domaine médical et le domaine de la gestion un contexte Evidence Based (Colyer et Kamath, 1999), des politiques Evidence Based (Mullen, 2002), ainsi qu'une gestion Evidence Based (Kieran et Rundall, 2001) fondée sur la Cost-effectiveness evidence (Niessen, et al, 2001). Au total, émerge un paradigme Evidence Based (Gill et al, 1996) qui tend à s'imposer, pour certains, de façon totalitaire (Holmes et al, 2006).…”
Section: La Perspective Evidence Based Practice Et La Conduite Des Pounclassified