Evidence-based guidelines for cataract surgery: Guidelines based on data in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery database
Abstract:In March 2008, the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) commenced. This 3-year project was cofunded by the European Union (EU) and the European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons (ESCRS). The ESCRS became the lead partner in the project with 11 national societies as associated partners. The aims of the project were to improve treatment and standards of care for cataract and refractive surgery and to develop evidence-based guidelines for cataract and refract… Show more
“…Another benchmark for comparison was the results of the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) database. A benchmark of at least 87 % of surgeries having a refractive outcome of a spherical equivalent within ±1D of the targeted refraction and a mean biometric prediction error of 0.6D was recommended in this study [11]. Their figure of 87 % was nearly matched by our figures, and the mean biometric prediction error of 0.53D in our data also fell within these benchmarks.…”
Section: Prediction Of Refractive Outcomessupporting
Refractive and visual outcomes were similar in both groups. Despite the slightly higher rate of postoperative macula edema, we were able to observe that the combination of these two procedures is a feasible method in glaucoma and cataract surgeries.
“…Another benchmark for comparison was the results of the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO) database. A benchmark of at least 87 % of surgeries having a refractive outcome of a spherical equivalent within ±1D of the targeted refraction and a mean biometric prediction error of 0.6D was recommended in this study [11]. Their figure of 87 % was nearly matched by our figures, and the mean biometric prediction error of 0.53D in our data also fell within these benchmarks.…”
Section: Prediction Of Refractive Outcomessupporting
Refractive and visual outcomes were similar in both groups. Despite the slightly higher rate of postoperative macula edema, we were able to observe that the combination of these two procedures is a feasible method in glaucoma and cataract surgeries.
“…This trend is consistent with the rate of 1.1% reported by Zaidi et al 12 at the Western Eye Hospital in London in 2007. A recent large-scale European study including 11 national societies reported a total capsule complication rate of 1.2% 14. It is possible that the lower rate of PCR in this study is due to the difference in the period at which the data was collected.…”
This is the first large-scale retrospective study of cataract surgery outcomes in the UK independent sector. The results indicate comparable or lower rates for most complications as compared with data collected in a previously published study.
“…The European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery has one of the largest and most current databases collected to date regarding the overall outcomes of cataract surgery (more than 500 000 cases treated between January 2009 and August 2011). 12 In eyes for which postoperative refractive data were available, 91.5% of results were within G1.00 D of the target refraction. Behndig et al 13 report similar results for a Swedish outcomes registry containing more than 15 000 eyes; 71% of eyes were within G0.50 D of the target refraction and 93% were within 1.00 D. Gale et al 14 analyzed a United Kingdom outcomes database over 3 audit periods and found results within G0.50 D for between 49% and 60% of eyes and results within G1.00 D for between 80% and 87% of eyes.…”
In this large series of eyes, the calculation of IOL power after RK using sagittal front-surface power and CCT from the Scheimpflug system produced results equivalent to the multizone approach with the topography system.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.