Evidence-Based Medicine, the Research-Practice Gap, and Biases in Medical and Surgical Decision Making in Dermatology

Abstract

he objectives of this article are to promote a better understanding of a group of biases that influence therapeutic decision making by physicians/dermatologists and to raise the awareness that these biases contribute to a research-practice gap that has an impact on physicians and treatment solutions. The literature included a wide range of peer-reviewed articles dealing with biases in decision making, evidence-based medicine, randomized controlled clinical trials, and the research-practice gap. Bias against new therapies, bias in favor of indirect harm or omission, and bias against change when multiple new choices are offered may unconsciously affect therapeutic decision making. Although there is no comprehensive understanding or theory as to how choices are made by physicians, recognition of certain cognition patterns and their associated biases will help narrow the research-practice gap and optimize decision making regarding therapeutic choices.

Clinical Research Fails to Support More Aggressive Management of Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures

“…Patients and parents may also believe that more elaborate techniques are indicative of better, more progressive care that may help them return to normal function, or perhaps their sports activities, sooner. In an effort to help their patients, physicians may be willing to try anything and everything possible and to perform more rather than fewer procedures 19,23 . Additionally, operative treatment may be more convenient than conservative treatment if resources needed for conservative treatment, such as conscious sedation, are limited in a particular treatment setting, or if the close follow-up needed for conservative treatment is impractical for a particular patient or population.…”

Challenges newly-arrived migrant women in Montreal face when needing maternity care: Health care professionals’ perspectives

“…Then, we proceeded to the identification of a preliminary framework reflecting participants’ perspectives as well as theoretical discussions on the topic [22–24, 26, 30, 32–34, 41]. We used this analytic structure for indexing the data , a procedure most commonly referred to as coding (e.g., [42]).…”

“…Some health care professionals, guided by the perceptions they have of their patients, may use the power associated with their position to revindicate certain values that contribute to health care inequities [27, 32–34], creating a distance between “us” and “them” (i.e., their patients) [35]. …”

Venous ulcers: So many guidelines, too many guidelines?

“…Most experts favor evidence that supports their intrinsic biases. 8 This may be, in part, the reason the majority of guidelines recommend debridement for VLU despite limited data supporting its use. In these cases lower levels of evidence might have been relied upon because that data confirmed biases.…”